The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disposition of Propofol Administered as Constant Rate Intravenous Infusions in Humans
Abstract
The disposition of the intravenous anesthetic propofol was studied when administered as a constant rate infusion at 3, 6, and 9 mg.kg-1.hr-1 for at least 2 hr to three groups of six patients each undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia. Arterial blood samples were collected at selected times during and up to 8 hr after infusion. Whole blood propofol concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Using a non-linear least-squares regression analysis, the individual data sets were best fitted by a three-compartment open mamillary model with central elimination in 17 patients. In one patient a biexponential equation was more appropriate. Derived pharmacokinetic parameters expressed as mean values +/- SD indicated an initial fast distribution (t1/2 pi; 2.8 +/- 1.2 min), with an intermediate phase (t1/2 alpha; 31.4 +/- 14.7 min), and a long terminal phase (t1/2 beta; 355 +/- 227 min), a large volume of distribution at steady state (Vss, 287 +/- 213 L), and a high blood clearance (Clb, 1.7 +/- 0.3 L/min). The function of drug in the central compartment in the terminal phase was low (Fc, 0.02). The elimination rate constant (K10, 0.1190 +/- 0.0351 min-1) was large compared with the other transfer rate constants and was responsible for the large amount of drug eliminated during distribution. The fraction of drug eliminated during the terminal phase amounted to 0.28. The slow return of drug from remote tissues (K31, 0.0033 +/- 0.0013 min-1) was rate limiting in the ultimate elimination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schnider, T. W., Minto, C. F., Gambus, P. L., Andresen, C., Goodale, D. B., Shafer, S. L., & Youngs, E. J. (1998) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199805000-00006 · Cited by 1,162
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol
Sahinovic, M. M., Struys, M. M. R. F., & Absalom, A. R. (2018) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3 · Cited by 809
Pharmacokinetic models for propofol—defining and illuminating the devil in the detail
Absalom, A. R., Mani, V., De Smet, T., & Struys, M. M. R. F. (2009) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aep143 · Cited by 435
Population Pharmacokinetics of Propofol: A Multicenter Study
Schüttler, J., & Ihmsen, H. (2000) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200003000-00017 · Cited by 434
Cerebral Metabolism during Propofol Anesthesia in Humans Studied with Positron Emission Tomography
Alkire, M. T., Haier, R. J., Barker, S. J., Shah, N. K., Wu, J. C., & Kao, J. Y. (1995) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199502000-00010 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Gepts, E., Camu, F., Cockshott, I. D., & Douglas, E. J.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1256???1263
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070469839
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disposition of Propofol Administered as Constant Rate Intravenous Infusions in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/00000539-198712000-00010
- The paper
- Gepts, E., Camu, F., Cockshott, I. D., & Douglas, E. J. (1987). Disposition of Propofol Administered as Constant Rate Intravenous Infusions in Humans. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198712000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.