Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pain Relief After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Comparison of Intraarticular Analgesia, Suprascapular Nerve Block, and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

Singelyn, Fran??ois J., Lhotel, Laurence, Fabre, Bertrand·2004·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

In Brief In this prospective, randomized, blinded study, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), suprascapular nerve block (SSB), and intraarticular local anesthetic (IA) after arthroscopic acromioplasty. One-hundred-twenty patients were divided into 4 groups of 30. In Group SSB, the block was performed with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. In Group IA, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered intraarticularly at the end of surgery. In Group ISB, the block was performed with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. A control group was included for comparison. General anesthesia was administered to all patients. Patients were observed during the first 24 h. Pain scores, supplemental analgesia, satisfaction scores, and side effects were recorded at 4 and 24 h. No significant difference was observed between the IA and control groups. When compared with these groups, Groups SSB and ISB had significantly lower pain scores. At 4-h follow-up, better pain relief on movement was noted in Group ISB than in Group SSB. When compared with controls, a significant reduction in morphine consumption and a better satisfaction score were noted only in Group ISB. We conclude that ISB is the most efficient analgesic technique after arthroscopic acromioplasty. SSN block would be a clinically appropriate alternative. IMPLICATIONS: The authors demonstrate that single-dose interscalene brachial plexus block is the most efficient analgesic technique after arthro-scopic shoulder surgery. A suprascapular nerve block is a clinically appropriate alternative, but single-dose intraarticular local anesthetic has no beneficial effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/01.ane.0000125112.83117.49

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Singelyn, F. J., Lhotel, L., & Fabre, B.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2004-08
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
589-592
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094497873
Cited by
267
References
0
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain Relief After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Comparison of Intraarticular Analgesia, Suprascapular Nerve Block, and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/01.ane.0000125112.83117.49
The paper
Singelyn, F. J., Lhotel, L., & Fabre, B. (2004). Pain Relief After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Comparison of Intraarticular Analgesia, Suprascapular Nerve Block, and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000125112.83117.49

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.