The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Anemia in the Elective Surgical Patient
Abstract
In Brief The prevalence of anemia in elective surgical patients may be as frequent as 75% in certain populations. A national audit demonstrated that 35% of patients scheduled for joint replacement therapy have a hemoglobin <13 g/dL on preadmission testing. Standard practice currently consists of preadmission testing 3 to 7 days before an elective operative procedure, precluding the opportunity to effectively evaluate and manage a patient with unexpected anemia. Therefore, a standardized approach for the detection, evaluation, and management of anemia in the preoperative surgical setting was identified as an unmet medical need. To address this knowledge gap, we convened a panel of physicians to develop a clinical care pathway for anemia management in this setting. Elective surgery patients should receive a hemoglobin (Hgb) determination a minimum of 30 days before the scheduled surgical procedure. Because the identification and evaluation of anemia in this setting will assist in expedited diagnosis and treatment of underlying comorbidities and will improve patient outcomes, unexplained anemia (Hgb <12g/dL for females and <13g/dL for males) should cause elective surgery to be deferred until an evaluation can be performed. IMPLICATIONS: Up to 35% of patients scheduled for elective surgery are found to be anemic (hemoglobin <13.0 g/dL) on preadmission testing. There are no guidelines for the evaluation and management for these patients. To address this unmet medical need, a panel of multidisciplinary experts was convened. A clinical care pathway for the screening, evaluation, and management of anemia in the elective surgery patient is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weiss, G., & Goodnough, L. T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041809 · Cited by 3,800
Self-citation
Cited by
Wu, W.-C., Schifftner, T. L., Henderson, W. G., Eaton, C. B., Poses, R. M., Uttley, G., Sharma, S. C., Vezeridis, M., Khuri, S. F., & Friedmann, P. D. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.22.2481 · Cited by 586
Goodnough, L. T., Maniatis, A., Earnshaw, P., Benoni, G., Beris, P., Bisbe, E., Fergusson, D. A., Gombotz, H., Habler, O., Monk, T. G., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeq361 · Cited by 543
Self-citationBlood use in elective surgery: the Austrian benchmark study
Gombotz, H., Rehak, P. H., Shander, A., & Hofmann, A. (2007) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01286.x · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodnough, L. T., Shander, A., Spivak, J. L., Waters, J. H., Friedman, A. J., Carson, J. L., Keating, E. M., Maddox, T., & Spence, R.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1858-1861
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170771199
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Anemia in the Elective Surgical Patient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/01.ane.0000184124.29397.eb
- The paper
- Goodnough, L. T., Shander, A., Spivak, J. L., Waters, J. H., Friedman, A. J., Carson, J. L., Keating, E. M., Maddox, T., & Spence, R. (2005). Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Anemia in the Elective Surgical Patient. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000184124.29397.eb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.