Cited by 87Anesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy-related medical research

Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery and Vaginal Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Kainu, J. Petter, Halmesmäki, Erja, Korttila, Kari T., Sarvela, P. Johanna·2016·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

Background Persistent pain after cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery has been the subject of only a few research articles. The primary outcome of our prospective study was the incidence of persistent pain and its association to mode of delivery. We also studied the nature and intensity of pain after delivery. Methods A questionnaire was distributed on postpartum day 2 to 1052 women who had given birth vaginally and to 502 who had undergone cesarean delivery in a tertiary maternity hospital in Helsinki, Finland, in 2010. A second questionnaire was mailed to the women 1 year later. We recorded the women's health history, obstetric history and previous pain history, details of cesarean delivery or vaginal delivery, and description of pain, if present. Results The incidence of persistent pain at 1 year after delivery was greater after cesarean delivery (85/379 [22%]) than after vaginal delivery (58/713 [8%]: P Conclusions The incidence of persistent pain at 1 year is greater after cesarean delivery than after vaginal delivery. Pain shortly after cesarean delivery and during vaginal delivery correlated with persistent pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/ane.0000000000001619

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kainu, J. P., Halmesmäki, E., Korttila, K. T., & Sarvela, P. J.
Affiliations
Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
  • Kainu, J. Petter
  • Korttila, Kari T.
  • Sarvela, P. Johanna
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2016-12
Volume
123
Issue
6
Pages
1535-1545
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2548235365
Cited by
87
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
cesarean section, vaginal delivery, mode of delivery, dyspareunia, postoperative pain, primiparous women, history of pain, perineal trauma, episiotomy, vacuum extraction, endometritis, wound infection, postpartum depression, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cesarean Section, Dyspareunia, Female, Finland, Hospitals, Maternity, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Incidence, Chi-Square Distribution, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Parturition, Labor Pain, Young Adult, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review