Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Awareness During Anesthesia: Risk Factors, Causes and Sequelae: A Review of Reported Cases in the Literature

Ghoneim, Mohamed M., Block, Robert I., Haffarnan, Mary, Mathews, Maya J.·2009·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Awareness during anesthesia is uncommon. The number of cases that are found in one single study are insufficient to identify and estimate the risks, causal factors and sequelae. One method of studying a large number of cases is to analyze reports of cases of awareness that have been published in scientific journals. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of the literature in the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database for case reports on "Awareness" and "Anesthesia" for the time period between 1950 through August, 2005. We also manually searched references cited in these reports and in other articles on awareness. We used two surgical control groups for comparative purposes. The first group in a study by Sebel et al. consisted of patients who did not experience awareness. The second group, from the 1996 data from the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery included patients who received general anesthesia. We also used data from the National Center for Health Statistics to compare weight and Body Mass Index. RESULTS: We compared the data of 271 cases of awareness with 19,504 patients who did not suffer it. Aware patients were more likely to be females (P < 0.05), younger (P < 0.001) and to have cardiac and obstetrics operations (P < 0.0001). Only 35% reported the awareness episode during the stay in the recovery room. They received fewer anesthetic drugs (P < 0.0001), and were more likely to exhibit episodes of tachycardia and hypertension during surgery (P < 0.0001). A much larger percentage of these patients (52%, P < 0.0001) voiced postoperative complaints related to awareness. Inability to move and feelings such as helplessness, sensation of weakness, and hearing noises and voices were related to the persistence of complaints such as sleep disturbances and fear about future anesthetics (P < 0.041-0.0003). Twenty-two percent of the patients suffered late psychological symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggested light anesthesia and a history of awareness as risk factors. Obesity and avoidance of nitrous oxide use did not seem to increase the risk. Light anesthesia was the most common cause. Our findings suggest preventive procedures that may lead to a decrease in the incidence of awareness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/ane.0b013e318193c634

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Sebel, 2004, The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: a multicenter United States study., Anesth Analg, 99, 833, 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130261.90896.6C · DOI · Paper page
  2. Pollard, 2007, Intraoperative awareness in a regional medical system. A review of 3 years data., Anesthesiology, 106, 269, 10.1097/00000542-200702000-00014 · doi:10.1097/00000542-200702000-00014
  3. Myles, 2004, A randomized controlled trial of BIS monitoring to prevent awareness during anesthesia: the B-Aware trial., Lancet, 363, 1757, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16300-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Auroy, 2004, Risk assessment and control require analysis of both outcomes and process of care., Anesthesiology, 101, 815, 10.1097/00000542-200410000-00002 · doi:10.1097/00000542-200410000-00002
  5. Scoville, 1957, Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesion., J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat, 20, 411, 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Winterbottom, 1950, Insufficient anaesthesia., BMJ, 1, 247, 10.1136/bmj.1.4647.247-c · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.4647.247-c
  7. Albright, 1979, Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine., Anesthesiology, 51, 285, 10.1097/00000542-197910000-00001 · doi:10.1097/00000542-197910000-00001
  8. Shiga, 2005, Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients., Anesthesiology, 103, 429, 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00027 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ghoneim, 2007, Incidence and risk factors for awareness during anesthesia., Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 21, 327, 10.1016/j.bpa.2007.05.002 · DOI
  10. Buchanan, 2006, Gender and recovery after general anesthesia combined with neuromuscular blocking drugs., Anesth Analg, 102, 291, 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181321.55422.C6 · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000181321.55422.c6
  11. Domino, 1999, Awareness during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis., Anesthesiology, 90, 1053, 10.1097/00000542-199904000-00019 · doi:10.1097/00000542-199904000-00019
  12. Ranta, 1997, The claims for compensation for awareness with recall during general anesthesia in Finland., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 41, 356, 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04698.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04698.x
  13. Gan, 1999, Women emerge from general anesthesia with propofol/alfentanil/ nitrous oxide faster than men., Anesthesiology, 90, 1283, 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00010 · DOI
  14. Hoymork, 2005, Why do women wake up faster than men from propofol anesthesia., Br J Anaesth, 95, 627, 10.1093/bja/aei245 · DOI
  15. Guerra, 1986, Awareness and recall. Neurological and psychological complications of surgery and anesthesia., Intern Anesthesiol Clin, 24, 75, 10.1097/00004311-198602440-00007 · doi:10.1097/00004311-198602440-00007
  16. Tramer, 1996, Omitting nitrous oxide in general anesthesia: meta-analysis of intraoperative awareness and postoperative emesis in randomized controlled trials., Br J Anaesth, 76, 186, 10.1093/bja/76.2.186 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Eger, 1990, Clinical pharmacology of nitrous oxide: an argument for its continued use., Anesth Analg, 71, 575, 10.1213/00000539-199012000-00001 · doi:10.1213/00000539-199012000-00001
  18. Myles, 2000, Patient satisfaction after anesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10811 patients., Br J Anaesth, 84, 6, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013383 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Samuelsson, 2007, Late psychological symptoms after awareness among consecutively included surgical patients., Anesthesiology, 106, 26, 10.1097/00000542-200701000-00009 · DOI
  20. Meyer, 1961, A traumatic neurotic reaction induced by succinylcholine chloride., N Y State J Med, 61, 1255
  21. Jones, 1994, Perception and memory during general anesthesia., Br J Anaesth, 73, 31, 10.1093/bja/73.1.31 · DOI
  22. Guerra, 1980, Awareness during anesthesia., Canad Anaesth Soc J, 27, 178, 10.1007/BF03007785 · doi:10.1007/bf03007785
  23. O’Hara, 1989, Psychological consequences of surgery., Psychosomatic Med, 51, 356, 10.1097/00006842-198905000-00010 · DOI
  24. Utting, 1975, Phillip Gett memorial lecture: Awareness in anesthesia., Anaesth Intens Care, 3, 334, 10.1177/0310057X7500300410 · doi:10.1177/0310057x7500300410
  25. Avidan, 2008, Anesthesia awareness and bispectral index., N Engl J Med, 358, 1097, 10.1056/NEJMoa0707361 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Ghoneim, M. M., Block, R. I., Haffarnan, M., & Mathews, M. J.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2009-02
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
527-535
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072983807
Cited by
260
References
0
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Awareness During Anesthesia: Risk Factors, Causes and Sequelae: A Review of Reported Cases in the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/ane.0b013e318193c634
The paper
Ghoneim, M. M., Block, R. I., Haffarnan, M., & Mathews, M. J. (2009). Awareness During Anesthesia: Risk Factors, Causes and Sequelae: A Review of Reported Cases in the Literature. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318193c634

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.