The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spike and slab variable selection: Frequentist and Bayesian strategies
Open accessAbstract
Variable selection in the linear regression model takes many apparent faces from both frequentist and Bayesian standpoints. In this paper we introduce a variable selection method referred to as a rescaled spike and slab model. We study the importance of prior hierarchical specifications and draw connections to frequentist generalized ridge regression estimation. Specifically, we study the usefulness of continuous bimodal priors to model hypervariance parameters, and the effect scaling has on the posterior mean through its relationship to penalization. Several model selection strategies, some frequentist and some Bayesian in nature, are developed and studied theoretically. We demonstrate the importance of selective shrinkage for effective variable selection in terms of risk misclassification, and show this is achieved using the posterior from a rescaled spike and slab model. We also show how to verify a procedure’s ability to reduce model uncertainty in finite samples using a specialized forward selection strategy. Using this tool, we illustrate the effectiveness of rescaled spike and slab models in reducing model uncertainty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Variable Selection via Gibbs Sampling
George, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476353 · Cited by 2,828
Model Selection Via Multifold Cross Validation
Zhang, P. (1993) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176349027 · Cited by 539
Prediction via Orthogonalized Model Mixing
Clyde, M., Desimone, H., & Parmigiani, G. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476989 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · Cited by 20,957
Penalising Model Component Complexity: A Principled, Practical Approach to Constructing Priors
Simpson, D., Rue, H., Riebler, A., Martins, T. G., & Sørbye, S. H. (2017) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/16-sts576 · Cited by 1,085
Optimization with Sparsity-Inducing Penalties
Bach, F. (2011) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601985118 · Cited by 608
Bayesian linear regression with sparse priors
Castillo, I., Schmidt-Hieber, J., & van der Vaart, A. (2015) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aos1334 · Cited by 277
The Rhetoric and Reality of Anthropomorphism in Artificial Intelligence
Watson, D. (2019) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-019-09506-6 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishwaran, H., & Rao, J. S.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 730-773
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969415786
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spike and slab variable selection: Frequentist and Bayesian strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/009053604000001147
- The paper
- Ishwaran, H., & Rao, J. S. (2005). Spike and slab variable selection: Frequentist and Bayesian strategies. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000001147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.