The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extending the rank likelihood for semiparametric copula estimation
Open accessAbstract
Quantitative studies in many fields involve the analysis of multivariate data of diverse types, including measurements that we may consider binary, ordinal and continuous. One approach to the analysis of such mixed data is to use a copula model, in which the associations among the variables are parameterized separately from their univariate marginal distributions. The purpose of this article is to provide a simple, general method of semiparametric inference for copula models via a type of rank likelihood function for the association parameters. The proposed method of inference can be viewed as a generalization of marginal likelihood estimation, in which inference for a parameter of interest is based on a summary statistic whose sampling distribution is not a function of any nuisance parameters. In the context of copula estimation, the extended rank likelihood is a function of the association parameters only and its applicability does not depend on any assumptions about the marginal distributions of the data, thus making it appropriate for the analysis of mixed continuous and discrete data with arbitrary marginal distributions. Estimation and inference for parameters of the Gaussian copula are available via a straightforward Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm based on Gibbs sampling. Specification of prior distributions or a parametric form for the univariate marginal distributions of the data is not necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-642350-1.x5017-6 · Cited by 1,502
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient
Olsson, U. (1979) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296207 · Cited by 1,127
Congdon, P. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0470867159 · Cited by 653
Likelihood Methods in Statistics
Severini, T. A. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198506508.001.0001 · Cited by 539
Day, J. C., & Newburger, E. C. (2002) · Cited by 487
Family Matters: Impacts of Family Background on Educational Attainments
Ermisch, J., & Francesconi, M. (2001) · Economica · doi:10.1111/1468-0335.00239 · Cited by 403
Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States
Hopcroft, R. L. (2006) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004 · Cited by 316
Bayesian Latent Variable Models for Clustered Mixed Outcomes
Dunson, D. B. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00236 · Cited by 305
Efficient Bayesian inference for Gaussian copula regression models
Pitt, M., Chan, D., & Kohn, R. (2006) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/93.3.537 · Cited by 256
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis of Correlated Count Data
Chib, S., & Winkelmann, R. (2001) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/07350010152596673 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, the
(2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1316 · Cited by 720
Isvoranu, A.-M., & Epskamp, S. (2023) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000439 · Cited by 401
BGGM: Bayesian Gaussian Graphical Models in R
Williams, D., & Mulder, J. (2020) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.02111 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- D. Hoff, P.
- Venue
- The Annals of Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 265-283
- ISSN
- 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992535794
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending the rank likelihood for semiparametric copula estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/07-aoas107
- The paper
- D. Hoff, P. (2007). Extending the rank likelihood for semiparametric copula estimation. The Annals of Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-aoas107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.