Cited by 414Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsOptimal Experimental Design Methods

Covariate Balance in Simple, Stratified and Clustered Comparative Studies

Open access
Hansen, Ben B., Bowers, Jake·2008·Statistical Science

Abstract

In randomized experiments, treatment and control groups should be roughly the same—balanced—in their distributions of pretreatment variables. But how nearly so? Can descriptive comparisons meaningfully be paired with significance tests? If so, should there be several such tests, one for each pretreatment variable, or should there be a single, omnibus test? Could such a test be engineered to give easily computed p-values that are reliable in samples of moderate size, or would simulation be needed for reliable calibration? What new concerns are introduced by random assignment of clusters? Which tests of balance would be optimal? To address these questions, Fisher’s randomization inference is applied to the question of balance. Its application suggests the reversal of published conclusions about two studies, one clinical and the other a field experiment in political participation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/08-sts254

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results of Moving to Opportunity have been mixed.

    “The results have been mixed.”

    From Reducing Violence by Transforming Neighborhoods: A Natural Experiment in Medellin, Colombia (2012) · cites this paper as [23]

    The passages from Section 1.2 and the additional searches discuss the Vote’98 voter-turnout experiment, not Moving to Opportunity. Searches for “Moving to Opportunity” and its housing-voucher outcomes found no passage in our copy addressing whether its results were mixed. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although male and female youth from families that received vouchers to relocate to lower-poverty areas experienced declining involvement in violent crimes, male youth also experienced more conduct disorder, other problem behaviors, and property crime arrests.

    “Although male and female youth from families that received vouchers to relocate to lowerpoverty areas experienced declining involvement in violent crimes, male youth also experienced more conduct disorder, other problem behaviors, and property crime arrests (23).”

    From Reducing Violence by Transforming Neighborhoods: A Natural Experiment in Medellin, Colombia (2012) · cites this paper as [23]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 414

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. BOWERS, J. and HANSEN, B. B. (2006). RItools, an add-on pack- age for R. BRAZZALE, A. R., DAVISON, A. C. and REID, N. (2006). Ap- plied Asymptotics. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  2. COCHRAN, W. G. and RUBIN, D. B. (1973). Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. Sankhyā Ser. A: Indian J. Sta- tist. 35 417-446.
  3. DAVISON, A. (2003). Statistical Models. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  4. FELLER, W. (1971). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. II, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
  5. FLEISS, J. (1973). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions Rates and Proportions. Wiley, New York.
  6. GERBER, A. S. and GREEN, D. P. (2000). The effects of canvass- ing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review 94 653-663.
  7. GERBER, A. S. and GREEN, D. P. (2005). Correction to Gerber and Green (2000), replication of disputed findings, and reply to Imai (2005). American Political Science Review 99 301-313.
  8. HÁJEK, J. and ŠIDÁK, Z. (1967). Theory of Rank Tests. Academic Press, New York.
  9. HARRELL, F. E. (2001). Regression Modeling Strategies: With Ap- plications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer, New York.
  10. HIGHTON, B. and WOLFINGER, R. (2001). The first seven years of the political life cycle. American Journal of Political Science 45 202-209.
  11. HILL, J. L., THOMAS, N. and RUBIN, D. B. (2000). The design of the New York schools choice scholarship program evaluation. In Research Design: Donald Campbell's Legacy (L. Bickman, ed) 155-180. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  12. IMAI, K. (2005). Do get-out-the-vote calls reduce turnout? The im- portance of statistical methods for field experiments. American Political Science Review 99 283-300.
  13. MURRAY, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group- randomized Trials. Oxford Univ. Press.

Authors
Hansen, B. B., & Bowers, J.
Venue
Statistical Science
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
219-236
ISSN
  • 0883-4237 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8745
OpenAlex
W1547147213
Cited by
414
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistical Science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Quality Engineering
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Keywords
covariate balance, stratified randomization, cluster randomization, omnibus test, field experiments, political participation, clinical trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review