Cited by 162Markov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceNeural Networks and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian Methods for Neural Networks and Related Models

Titterington, D. M.·2004·Statistical Science

Abstract

Models such as feed-forward neural networks and certain other structures investigated in the computer science literature are not amenable to closed-form Bayesian analysis. The paper reviews the various approaches taken to overcome this difficulty, involving the use of Gaussian approximations, Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation routines and a class of non-Gaussian but “deterministic” approximations called variational approximations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/088342304000000099

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 103 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Choudrey, R. and Roberts, S. J. (2001). Variational Bayesian independent component analysis with flexible sources. Technical Report PARG-01-03, Dept. Engineering Science, Univ. Oxford.
  2. MacKay, D. J. C. (1997). Ensemble learning for hidden Markov models. Technical report, Cavendish Lab., Univ. Cambridge.
  3. Ripley, B. D. (1995). Choosing network complexity. In Probabilistic Reasoning and Bayesian Belief Networks (A. Gammerman, ed.) 97--108. Waller, Henley-on-Thames, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Titterington, D. M.
Corresponding author
Titterington, D. M.
Venue
Statistical Science
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
128-139
ISSN
  • 0883-4237 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8745
OpenAlex
W2019449965
Cited by
162
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistical Science (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
Bayesian neural networks, feedforward neural networks, Gaussian approximation, Markov chain Monte Carlo, variational approximation, computational intractability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review