Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology

Open access
Baggerly, Keith A., Coombes, Kevin R.·2009·The Annals of Applied Statistics

Abstract

High-throughput biological assays such as microarrays let us ask very detailed questions about how diseases operate, and promise to let us personalize therapy. Data processing, however, is often not described well enough to allow for exact reproduction of the results, leading to exercises in “forensic bioinformatics” where aspects of raw data and reported results are used to infer what methods must have been employed. Unfortunately, poor documentation can shift from an inconvenience to an active danger when it obscures not just methods but errors. In this report we examine several related papers purporting to use microarray-based signatures of drug sensitivity derived from cell lines to predict patient response. Patients in clinical trials are currently being allocated to treatment arms on the basis of these results. However, we show in five case studies that the results incorporate several simple errors that may be putting patients at risk. One theme that emerges is that the most common errors are simple (e.g., row or column offsets); conversely, it is our experience that the most simple errors are common. We then discuss steps we are taking to avoid such errors in our own investigations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/09-aoas291

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Baggerly, K. A., Morris, J. S. and Coombes, K. R. (2004). Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: Comparing datasets from different experiments. Bioinformatics 20 777–785. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Augustine, C. K., Yoo, J. S., Potti, A., Yoshimoto, Y., Zipfel, P. A., Friedman, H. S., Nevins, J. R., Ali-Osman, F. and Tyler, D. S. (2009). Genomic and molecular profiling predicts response to temozolomide in melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 15 502–510. Correction p. 3240. · DOI
  3. Baggerly, K. A., Coombes, K. R. and Neeley, E. S. (2008). Run batch effects potentially compromise the usefulness of genomic signatures for ovarian cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 26 1186–1187. · DOI
  4. Baggerly, K. A., Edmonson, S. R., Morris, J. S. and Coombes, K. R. (2004). High-resolution serum proteomic patterns for ovarian cancer detection. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 11 583–584. · DOI
  5. Baggerly, K. A., Morris, J. S., Edmonson, S. R. and Coombes, K. R. (2005). Signal in noise: Evaluating reported reproducibility of serum proteomic tests for ovarian cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 97 307–309. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bonnefoi, H., Potti, A., Delorenzi, M., Mauriac, L., Campone, M., Tubiana-Hulin, M., Petit, T., Rouanet, P., Jassem, J., Blot, E., Becette, V., Farmer, P., Andre, S., Acharya, C. R., Mukherjee, S., Cameron, D., Bergh, J., Nevins, J. R. and Iggo, R. D. (2007). Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 8 1071–1078. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chang, J. C., Wooten, E. C., Tsimelzon, A., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Gutierrez, M. C., Elledge, R., Mohsin, S., Osborne, C. K., Chamness, G. C., Allred, D. C. and O’Connell, P. (2003). Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer. Lancet 362 362–369. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Coombes, K. R., Wang, J. and Baggerly, K. A. (2007). Microarrays: Retracing steps. Nat. Med. 13 1276–1277. · DOI
  9. Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible research: A bioinformatics case study. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4 Article 2. · DOI
  10. Gentleman, R. and Temple Lang, D. (2007). Statistical analyses and reproducible research. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 16 1–23. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Györffy, B., Surowiak, P., Kiesslich, O., Denkert, C., Schafer, R., Dietel, M. and Lage, H. (2006). Gene expression profiling of 30 cancer cell lines predicts resistance towards 11 anticancer drugs at clinically achieved concentrations. Int. J. Cancer 118 1699–1712. · doi:10.1007/bf01833154
  12. Holleman, A., Cheok, M. H., den Boer, M. L., Yang, W., Veerman, A. J., Kazemier, K. M., Pei, D., Cheng, C., Pui, C. H., Relling, M. V., Janka-Schaub, G. E., Pieters, R. and Evans, W. E. (2004). Gene-expression patterns in drug-resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells and response to treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 351 533–542. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hsu, D. S., Balakumaran, B. S., Acharya, C. R., Vlahovic, V., Walters, K. S., Garman, K., Anders, C., Riedel, R. F., Lancaster, J., Harpole, D., Dressman, H. K., Nevins, J. R., Febbo, P. G. and Potti, A. (2007). Pharmacogenomic strategies provide a rational approach to the treatment of cisplatin-resistant patients with advanced cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 25 4350–4357. · DOI
  14. Li, C. (2008). Automating dChip: Toward reproducible sharing of microarray data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9 231. · DOI
  15. Lugthart, S., Cheok, M. H., den Boer, M. L., Yang, W., Holleman, A., Cheng, C., Pui, C. H., Relling, M. V., Janka-Schaub, G. E., Pieters, R. and Evans, W. E. (2005). Identification of genes associated with chemotherapy crossresistance and treatment response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell 7 375–386. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Potti, A. and Nevins, J. (2007). Reply to Microarrays: Retracing steps. Nat. Med. 13 1277–1278. · doi:10.1038/nm1107-1277
  17. Potti, A., Dressman, H. K., Bild, A., Riedel, R. F., Chan, G., Sayer, R., Cragun, J., Cottrill, H., Kelley, M. J., Petersen, R., Harpole, D., Marks, J., Berchuck, A., Ginsburg, G. S., Febbo, P., Lancaster, J. and Nevins, J. R. (2006). Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat. Med. 12 1294–1300. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Potti, A., Dressman, H. K., Bild, A., Riedel, R. F., Chan, G., Sayer, R., Cragun, J., Cottrill, H., Kelley, M. J., Petersen, R., Harpole, D., Marks, J., Berchuck, A., Ginsburg, G. S., Febbo, P., Lancaster, J. and Nevins, J. (2008). Corrigendum to “Genomics signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics.” Nat. Med. 14 889. · doi:10.1038/nm0808-889
  19. Riedel, R. F., Porrello, A., Pontzer, E., Chenette, E. J., Hsu, D. S., Balakumaran, B., Potti, A., Nevins, J. and Febbo, P. G. (2008). A genomic approach to identify molecular pathways associated with chemotherapy resistance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7 3141–3149. · DOI
  20. Ruschhaupt, M., Huber, W., Poustka, A. and Mansmann, U. (2004). A compendium to ensure computational reproducibility in high-dimensional classification tasks. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3 37. · DOI
  21. Salter, K. H., Acharya, C. R., Walters, K. S., Redman, R., Anguiano, A., Garman, K. S., Anders, C. K., Mukherjee, S., Dressman, H. K., Barry, W. T., Marcom, K. P., Olson, J., Nevins, J. R. and Potti, A. (2008). An integrated approach to the prediction of chemotherapeutic response in patients with breast cancer. PLoS One 3 e1908. · DOI
  22. Baggerly, K. A. and Coombes, K. R. (2009a). Supplement 1, “Examining doxorubicin in detail,” to “Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology.” DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS291SUPPA. · doi:10.1214/09-aoas291suppa
  23. Baggerly, K. A. and Coombes, K. R. (2009b). Supplement 2, “Cisplatin and pemetrexed,” to “Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology.” DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS291SUPPB. · doi:10.1214/09-aoas291suppb
  24. Baggerly, K. A. and Coombes, K. R. (2009c). Supplement 3, “Examining combination therapy,” to “Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology.” DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS291SUPPC. · doi:10.1214/09-aoas291suppc
  25. Baggerly, K. A. and Coombes, K. R. (2009d). Supplement 4, “Surveying cell lines,” to “Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology.” DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS291SUPPD. · doi:10.1214/09-aoas291suppd
  26. Baggerly, K. A. and Coombes, K. R. (2009e). Supplement 5, “Examining docetaxel in detail,” to “Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology.” DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS291SUPPE. · doi:10.1214/09-aoas291suppe
  27. Leisch, F. (2002). Dynamic generation of statistical reports using literate data analysis. In Compstat 2002—Proceedings in Computational Statistics (W. Härdle and B. Rönz, eds.) 575–580. Physika Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Stivers, D. N., Wang, J., Rosner, G. L. and Coombes, K. R. (2003). Organ-specific differences in gene expression and UniGene annotations describing source material. In Methods of Microarray Data Analysis III (K. Johnson and S. Lin, eds.) 59–72. Kluwer Academic, Boston. · doi:10.1007/0-306-48354-8_5

Metadata

Authors
Baggerly, K. A., & Coombes, K. R.
Venue
The Annals of Applied Statistics
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
1309-1334
ISSN
1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979916898
Cited by
312
References
2
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/09-aoas291
The paper
Baggerly, K. A., & Coombes, K. R. (2009). Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology. The Annals of Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-aoas291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.