The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sparsistency and rates of convergence in large covariance matrix estimation
Open accessAbstract
This paper studies the sparsistency and rates of convergence for estimating sparse covariance and precision matrices based on penalized likelihood with nonconvex penalty functions. Here, sparsistency refers to the property that all parameters that are zero are actually estimated as zero with probability tending to one. Depending on the case of applications, sparsity priori may occur on the covariance matrix, its inverse or its Cholesky decomposition. We study these three sparsity exploration problems under a unified framework with a general penalty function. We show that the rates of convergence for these problems under the Frobenius norm are of order (s(n) log p(n)/n)(1/2), where s(n) is the number of nonzero elements, p(n) is the size of the covariance matrix and n is the sample size. This explicitly spells out the contribution of high-dimensionality is merely of a logarithmic factor. The conditions on the rate with which the tuning parameter λ(n) goes to 0 have been made explicit and compared under different penalties. As a result, for the L(1)-penalty, to guarantee the sparsistency and optimal rate of convergence, the number of nonzero elements should be small: sn'=O(pn) at most, among O(pn2) parameters, for estimating sparse covariance or correlation matrix, sparse precision or inverse correlation matrix or sparse Cholesky factor, where sn' is the number of the nonzero elements on the off-diagonal entries. On the other hand, using the SCAD or hard-thresholding penalty functions, there is no such a restriction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Cited by
Sparse and Compositionally Robust Inference of Microbial Ecological Networks
Kurtz, Z. D., Müller, C. L., Miraldi, E. R., Littman, D. R., Blaser, M. J., & Bonneau, R. A. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004226 · Cited by 1,799
Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements
Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Mincheva, M. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12016 · Cited by 909
Self-citationHigh-dimensional covariance estimation by minimizing ℓ1-penalized log-determinant divergence
Ravikumar, P., Wainwright, M. J., Raskutti, G., & Yu, B. (2011) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/11-ejs631 · Cited by 744
Sparse permutation invariant covariance estimation
Rothman, A. J., Bickel, P. J., Levina, E., & Zhu, J. (2008) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/08-ejs176 · Cited by 560
High-dimensional semiparametric Gaussian copula graphical models
Liu, H., Han, F., Yuan, M., Lafferty, J., & Wasserman, L. (2012) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/12-aos1037 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Lam, C., & Fan, J.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6B
- Pages
- 4254-4278
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972276842
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sparsistency and rates of convergence in large covariance matrix estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/09-aos720
- The paper
- Lam, C., & Fan, J. (2009). Sparsistency and rates of convergence in large covariance matrix estimation. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-aos720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.