Cited by 91Topological and Geometric Data AnalysisHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyGeometric and Algebraic Topology

Persistent homology for random fields and complexes

Open access
Adler, Robert J., Bobrowski, Omer, Borman, Matthew S., Subag, Eliran, Weinberger, Shmuel·2010·Institute of Mathematical Statistics Collections

Abstract

<!-- *** Custom HTML *** --> We discuss and review recent developments in the area of applied algebraic topology, such as persistent homology and barcodes. In particular, we discuss how these are related to understanding more about manifold learning from random point cloud data, the algebraic structure of simplicial complexes determined by random vertices and, in most detail, the algebraic topology of the excursion sets of random fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/10-imscoll609

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adler et al. (2010) defined the analogue of the Euler characteristic for persistent homology and studied it for Gaussian random fields.

    “Adler et al. (2010) have defined the analogue of the Euler characteristic for persistent homology and studied it for Gaussian random fields.”

    From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Adler et al. (2010)

  • In Adler et al. (2010) a result is proved which computes χ_pers for Gaussian random fields.

    “in Adler et al. (2010) a result is proved which computes χ pers for Gaussian random fields.”

    From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Adler et al. (2010)

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 91

Authors
Adler, R. J., Bobrowski, O., Borman, M. S., Subag, E., & Weinberger, S.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
Institute of Mathematical Statistics Collections
Published
2010
Pages
124-143
ISSN
  • 1937-5166 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-4039
OpenAlex
W1680861744
Cited by
91
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.38
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Institute of Mathematical Statistics collections (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
Keywords
persistent homology, barcodes, random fields, excursion sets, simplicial complexes, manifold learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review