The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian variable selection regression for genome-wide association studies and other large-scale problems
Open accessAbstract
We consider applying Bayesian Variable Selection Regression, or BVSR, to genome-wide association studies and similar large-scale regression problems. Currently, typical genome-wide association studies measure hundreds of thousands, or millions, of genetic variants (SNPs), in thousands or tens of thousands of individuals, and attempt to identify regions harboring SNPs that affect some phenotype or outcome of interest. This goal can naturally be cast as a variable selection regression problem, with the SNPs as the covariates in the regression. Characteristic features of genome-wide association studies include the following: (i) a focus primarily on identifying relevant variables, rather than on prediction; and (ii) many relevant covariates may have tiny effects, making it effectively impossible to confidently identify the complete “correct” subset of variables. Taken together, these factors put a premium on having interpretable measures of confidence for individual covariates being included in the model, which we argue is a strength of BVSR compared with alternatives such as penalized regression methods. Here we focus primarily on analysis of quantitative phenotypes, and on appropriate prior specification for BVSR in this setting, emphasizing the idea of considering what the priors imply about the total proportion of variance in outcome explained by relevant covariates. We also emphasize the potential for BVSR to estimate this proportion of variance explained, and hence shed light on the issue of “missing heritability” in genome-wide association studies. More generally, we demonstrate that, despite the apparent computational challenges, BVSR can provide useful inferences in these large-scale problems, and in our simulations produces better power and predictive performance compared with standard single-SNP analyses and the penalized regression method LASSO. Methods described here are implemented in a software package, pi-MASS, available from the Guan Lab website http://bcm.edu/cnrc/mcmcmc/pimass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
Davey Smith, G., & Ebrahim, S. (2003) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyg070 · Cited by 5,882
Variable Selection via Gibbs Sampling
George, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476353 · Cited by 2,828
A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes
Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2088 · Cited by 2,609
Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability
Maher, B. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/456018a · Cited by 1,737
Are Rare Variants Responsible for Susceptibility to Complex Diseases?
Pritchard, J. K. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/321272 · Cited by 1,197
Cited by
Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors
Ge, T., Chen, C.-Y., Ni, Y., Feng, Y.-C. A., & Smoller, J. W. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5 · Cited by 1,922
A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping
Wang, G., Sarkar, A., Carbonetto, P., & Stephens, M. (2020) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12388 · Cited by 1,121
Self-citationFINEMAP: efficient variable selection using summary data from genome-wide association studies
Benner, C., Spencer, C. C. A., Havulinna, A. S., Salomaa, V., Ripatti, S., & Pirinen, M. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw018 · Cited by 815
Panning for Gold: ‘Model-X’ Knockoffs for High Dimensional Controlled Variable Selection
Candès, E., Fan, Y., Janson, L., & Lv, J. (2018) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12265 · Cited by 632
Fine-mapping from summary data with the “Sum of Single Effects” model
Zou, Y., Carbonetto, P., Wang, G., & Stephens, M. (2022) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010299 · Cited by 429
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guan, Y., & Stephens, M.
- Venue
- The Annals of Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1780-1815
- ISSN
- 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032230252
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian variable selection regression for genome-wide association studies and other large-scale problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/11-aoas455
- The paper
- Guan, Y., & Stephens, M. (2011). Bayesian variable selection regression for genome-wide association studies and other large-scale problems. The Annals of Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/11-aoas455
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.