The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the empirical estimation of integral probability metrics
Open accessAbstract
Given two probability measures, $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ defined on a measurable space, $S$, the integral probability metric (IPM) is defined as $$\gamma_{\mathcal{F}}(\mathbb{P},\mathbb{Q})=\sup\left\{\left\vert \int_{S}f\,d\mathbb{P}-\int_{S}f\,d\mathbb{Q}\right\vert\,:\,f\in\mathcal{F}\right\},$$ where $\mathcal{F}$ is a class of real-valued bounded measurable functions on $S$. By appropriately choosing $\mathcal{F}$, various popular distances between $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$, including the Kantorovich metric, Fortet-Mourier metric, dual-bounded Lipschitz distance (also called the Dudley metric), total variation distance, and kernel distance, can be obtained. In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating $\gamma_{\mathcal{F}}$ from finite random samples drawn i.i.d. from $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$. Although the above mentioned distances cannot be computed in closed form for every $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$, we show their empirical estimators to be easily computable, and strongly consistent (except for the total-variation distance). We further analyze their rates of convergence. Based on these results, we discuss the advantages of certain choices of $\mathcal{F}$ (and therefore the corresponding IPMs) over others—in particular, the kernel distance is shown to have three favorable properties compared with the other mentioned distances: it is computationally cheaper, the empirical estimate converges at a faster rate to the population value, and the rate of convergence is independent of the dimension $d$ of the space (for $S=\mathbb{R}^{d}$). We also provide a novel interpretation of IPMs and their empirical estimators by relating them to the problem of binary classification: while the IPM between class-conditional distributions is the negative of the optimal risk associated with a binary classifier, the smoothness of an appropriate binary classifier (e.g., support vector machine, Lipschitz classifier, etc.) is inversely related to the empirical estimator of the IPM between these class-conditional distributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
(2012) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · doi:10.5555/2188385.2188410 · Cited by 3,603
Self-citationA Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition
Devroye, L., Györfi, L., & Lugosi, G. (1996) · Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0711-5 · Cited by 3,274
Cited by
Equivalence of distance-based and RKHS-based statistics in hypothesis testing
Sejdinovic, D., Sriperumbudur, B., Gretton, A., & Fukumizu, K. (2013) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1140 · Cited by 582
Self-citationKernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyond
Muandet, K., Fukumizu, K., Sriperumbudur, B., & Schölkopf, B. (2017) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000060 · Cited by 409
Self-citationCalibration tests beyond classification
Widmann, D., Lindsten, F., & Zachariah, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13355 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Sriperumbudur, B. K., Fukumizu, K., Gretton, A., Schölkopf, B., & Lanckriet, G. R. G.
- Venue
- Electronic Journal of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- none
- Pages
- 1550-1599
- ISSN
- 1935-7524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000992741
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the empirical estimation of integral probability metrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/12-ejs722
- The paper
- Sriperumbudur, B. K., Fukumizu, K., Gretton, A., Schölkopf, B., & Lanckriet, G. R. G. (2012). On the empirical estimation of integral probability metrics. Electronic Journal of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-ejs722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.