The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The graphical lasso: New insights and alternatives
Open accessAbstract
The graphical lasso [5] is an algorithm for learning the structure in an undirected Gaussian graphical model, using $\ell_{1}$ regularization to control the number of zeros in the precision matrix $\boldsymbol{\Theta}=\boldsymbol{\Sigma}^{-1}$ [2, 11]. The R package GLASSO [5] is popular, fast, and allows one to efficiently build a path of models for different values of the tuning parameter. Convergence of GLASSO can be tricky; the converged precision matrix might not be the inverse of the estimated covariance, and occasionally it fails to converge with warm starts. In this paper we explain this behavior, and propose new algorithms that appear to outperform GLASSO. By studying the “normal equations” we see that, GLASSO is solving the dual of the graphical lasso penalized likelihood, by block coordinate ascent; a result which can also be found in [2]. In this dual, the target of estimation is $\boldsymbol{\Sigma}$, the covariance matrix, rather than the precision matrix $\boldsymbol{\Theta}$. We propose similar primal algorithms P-GLASSO and DP-GLASSO, that also operate by block-coordinate descent, where $\boldsymbol{\Theta}$ is the optimization target. We study all of these algorithms, and in particular different approaches to solving their coordinate sub-problems. We conclude that DP-GLASSO is superior from several points of view.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Self-citationA Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045 · Cited by 6,355
Self-citationAlon, U., Barkai, N., Notterman, D. A., Gish, K., Ybarra, S., Mack, D., & Levine, A. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.12.6745 · Cited by 4,167
High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso
Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2006) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000000281 · Cited by 2,521
Model selection and estimation in the Gaussian graphical model
Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2007) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asm018 · Cited by 1,627
Banerjee, O., Ghaoui, L. E., & d’Aspremont, A. (2007) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.1145/1390681.1390696 · Cited by 1,233
Gradient methods for minimizing composite objective function
Nesterov, Y. E. (2007) · Cited by 867
Sparse permutation invariant covariance estimation
Rothman, A. J., Bickel, P. J., Levina, E., & Zhu, J. (2008) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/08-ejs176 · Cited by 560
Exact Covariance Thresholding into Connected Components for Large-Scale Graphical Lasso.
Mazumder, R., & Hastie, T. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 113
Self-citation
Cited by
The huge Package for High-dimensional Undirected Graph Estimation in R
Zhao, T., Liu, H., Roeder, K., Lafferty, J., & Wasserman, L. (2020) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14781 · Cited by 465
A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes
Colclough, G. L., Brookes, M. J., Smith, S. M., & Woolrich, M. W. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.071 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazumder, R., & Hastie, T.
- Venue
- Electronic Journal of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- none
- Pages
- 2125-2149
- ISSN
- 1935-7524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1486916140
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.