The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Models for Paired Comparison Data: A Review with Emphasis on Dependent Data
Open accessAbstract
Thurstonian and Bradley–Terry models are the most commonly applied models in the analysis of paired comparison data. Since their introduction, numerous developments have been proposed in different areas. This paper provides an updated overview of these extensions, including how to account for object- and subject-specific covariates and how to deal with ordinal paired comparison data. Special emphasis is given to models for dependent comparisons. Although these models are more realistic, their use is complicated by numerical difficulties. We therefore concentrate on implementation issues. In particular, a pairwise likelihood approach is explored for models for dependent paired comparison data, and a simulation study is carried out to compare the performance of maximum pairwise likelihood with other limited information estimation methods. The methodology is illustrated throughout using a real data set about university paired comparisons performed by students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons
Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334029 · Cited by 2,412
The Evaluation of General Non-Centred Orthant Probabilities
Miwa, T., Hayter, A. J., & Kuriki, S. (2003) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00382 · Cited by 100
Cited by
A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data
Sijtsma, K., & van der Ark, L. A. (2017) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12078 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Cattelan, M.
- Venue
- Statistical Science
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2012-08-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 412-433
- ISSN
- 0883-4237 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074184241
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models for Paired Comparison Data: A Review with Emphasis on Dependent Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/12-sts396
- The paper
- Cattelan, M. (2012). Models for Paired Comparison Data: A Review with Emphasis on Dependent Data. Statistical Science. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-sts396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.