The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wind Energy: Forecasting Challenges for Its Operational Management
Open accessAbstract
Renewable energy sources, especially wind energy, are to play a larger role in providing electricity to industrial and domestic consumers. This is already the case today for a number of European countries, closely followed by the US and high growth countries, for example, Brazil, India and China. There exist a number of technological, environmental and political challenges linked to supplementing existing electricity generation capacities with wind energy. Here, mathematicians and statisticians could make a substantial contribution at the interface of meteorology and decision-making, in connection with the generation of forecasts tailored to the various operational decision problems involved. Indeed, while wind energy may be seen as an environmentally friendly source of energy, full benefits from its usage can only be obtained if one is able to accommodate its variability and limited predictability. Based on a short presentation of its physical basics, the importance of considering wind power generation as a stochastic process is motivated. After describing representative operational decision-making problems for both market participants and system operators, it is underlined that forecasts should be issued in a probabilistic framework. Even though, eventually, the forecaster may only communicate single-valued predictions. The existing approaches to wind power forecasting are subsequently described, with focus on single-valued predictions, predictive marginal densities and space–time trajectories. Upcoming challenges related to generating improved and new types of forecasts, as well as their verification and value to forecast users, are finally discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913643 · Cited by 13,316
A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle
Hamilton, J. D. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912559 · Cited by 9,646
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793
Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems
Billinton, R., & Allan, R. N. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7731-7 · Cited by 3,350
Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems
Billinton, R., & Allan, R. N. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1860-4 · Cited by 2,974
Lindgren, F., Rue, H., & Lindström, J. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x · Cited by 2,708
Applied Statistical Decision Theory
Lindley, D. V., Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1962) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1909900 · Cited by 2,172
Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783
Applied Statistical Decision Theory.
Roberts, H. V., Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1962) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2282452 · Cited by 1,443
Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets
Conejo, A. J., Carrión, M., & Morales, J. M. (2010) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7421-1 · Cited by 1,231
Cited by
Empirical prediction intervals improve energy forecasting
Kaack, L. H., Apt, J., Morgan, M. G., & McSharry, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619938114 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinson, P.
- Venue
- Statistical Science
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 564-585
- ISSN
- 0883-4237 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982129843
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wind Energy: Forecasting Challenges for Its Operational Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/13-sts445
- The paper
- Pinson, P. (2013). Wind Energy: Forecasting Challenges for Its Operational Management. Statistical Science. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-sts445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.