The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the efficiency of pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithms
Open accessAbstract
We examine the behaviour of the pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithm, where evaluations of the target density for the accept/reject probability are estimated rather than computed precisely. Under relatively general conditions on the target distribution, we obtain limiting formulae for the acceptance rate and for the expected squared jump distance, as the dimension of the target approaches infinity, under the assumption that the noise in the estimate of the log-target is additive and is independent of the position. For targets with independent and identically distributed components, we also obtain a limiting diffusion for the first component. We then consider the overall efficiency of the algorithm, in terms of both speed of mixing and computational time. Assuming the additive noise is Gaussian and is inversely proportional to the number of unbiased estimates that are used, we prove that the algorithm is optimally efficient when the variance of the noise is approximately 3.283 and the acceptance rate is approximately 7.001%. We also find that the optimal scaling is insensitive to the noise and that the optimal variance of the noise is insensitive to the scaling. The theory is illustrated with a simulation study using the particle marginal random walk Metropolis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
Smith, A. F. M., & Roberts, G. O. (1993) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01466.x · Cited by 1,713
Self-citationWeak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms
Roberts, G. O., Gelman, A., & Gilks, W. R. (1997) · The Annals of Applied Probability · doi:10.1214/aoap/1034625254 · Cited by 1,693
Self-citationGolightly, A., & Wilkinson, D. J. (2011) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0047 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherlock, C., Thiery, A. H., Roberts, G. O., & Rosenthal, J. S.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2015-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 238-275
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003456014
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the efficiency of pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/14-aos1278
- The paper
- Sherlock, C., Thiery, A. H., Roberts, G. O., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2015). On the efficiency of pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithms. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-aos1278
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.