The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A general theory of hypothesis tests and confidence regions for sparse high dimensional models
Open accessAbstract
We consider the problem of uncertainty assessment for low dimensional components in high dimensional models. Specifically, we propose a novel decorrelated score function to handle the impact of high dimensional nuisance parameters. We consider both hypothesis tests and confidence regions for generic penalized M-estimators. Unlike most existing inferential methods which are tailored for individual models, our method provides a general framework for high dimensional inference and is applicable to a wide variety of applications. In particular, we apply this general framework to study five illustrative examples: linear regression, logistic regression, Poisson regression, Gaussian graphical model and additive hazards model. For hypothesis testing, we develop general theorems to characterize the limiting distributions of the decorrelated score test statistic under both null hypothesis and local alternatives. These results provide asymptotic guarantees on the type I errors and local powers. For confidence region construction, we show that the decorrelated score function can be used to construct point estimators that are asymptotically normal and semiparametrically efficient. We further generalize this framework to handle the settings of misspecified models. Thorough numerical results are provided to back up the developed theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
White, H. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912526 · Cited by 4,098
Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty
Zhang, C.-H. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos729 · Cited by 3,835
High dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso
Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2006) · Cited by 2,539
High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso
Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2006) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000000281 · Cited by 2,521
Simultaneous analysis of Lasso and Dantzig selector
Bickel, P. J., Ritov, Y., & Tsybakov, A. B. (2009) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/08-aos620 · Cited by 2,396
Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2010) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00740.x · Cited by 2,215
The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n
Candes, E., & Tao, T. (2007) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000001523 · Cited by 1,747
Asymptotics for lasso-type estimators
Fu, W., & Knight, K. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1015957397 · Cited by 1,276
Cited by
Uncertainty quantification in the Bradley–Terry–Luce model
Gao, C., Shen, Y., & Zhang, A. Y. (2023) · Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/imaiai/iaac032 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ning, Y., & Liu, H.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2017-02-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 158-195
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964331163
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A general theory of hypothesis tests and confidence regions for sparse high dimensional models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/16-aos1448
- The paper
- Ning, Y., & Liu, H. (2017). A general theory of hypothesis tests and confidence regions for sparse high dimensional models. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-aos1448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.