Optimal multilevel matching using network flows: An application to a summer reading intervention
Open accessAbstract
Many observational studies of causal effects occur in settings with clustered treatment assignment. In studies of this type, treatment is applied to entire clusters of units. For example, an educational intervention might be administered to all the students in a school. We develop a matching algorithm for multilevel data based on a network flow algorithm. Earlier work on multilevel matching relied on integer programming, which allows for balance targeting on specific covariates but can be slow with larger data sets. Although we cannot directly specify minimal levels of balance for individual covariates, our algorithm is fast and scales easily to larger data sets. We apply this algorithm to assess a school-based intervention through which students in treated schools were exposed to a new reading program during summer school. In one variant of the algorithm, where we match both schools and students, we change the causal estimand through optimal subset matching to better maintain common support. In a second variant, we relax the common support assumption to preserve the causal estimand by only matching on schools. We find that the summer intervention does not appear to increase reading test scores. In a sensitivity analysis, however, we determine that an unobserved confounder could easily mask a larger treatment effect.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Design of Observational Studies
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- BARNOW, B. S., CAIN, G. G. and GOLDBERGER, A. S. (1980). Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias. In Evaluation Studies (E. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas, eds.) 5 43-59. Sage, San Francisco, CA.
- COOPER, H., NYE, B., CHARLTON, K., LINDSAY, J. and GREATHOUSE, S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Rev. Educ. Res. 66 227-268.
- COOPER, H., CHARLTON, K., VALENTINE, J. C., MUHLENBRUCK, L. and BORMAN, G. D. (2000). Making the most of summer school: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 65 1-127.
- LEHMANN, E. L. and ROMANO, J. P. (2005). Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 3rd ed. Springer, New York.
- ROSENBAUM, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching
King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2019) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2019.11 · Cited by 1,706 · see citing works
The Educational Impacts of School Phone Bans: Evidence from Brazil
Lichand, G., Moreno-Louzada, L., da Costa, T., & Gentzkow, M. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6824971 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pimentel, S. D., Page, L. C., Lenard, M., & Keele, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Venue
- The Annals of Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2018-09-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1479-1505
- ISSN
- 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7330
- OpenAlex
- W2890477461
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- network flow algorithms, school-based intervention, summer reading programs, causal inference, common support, covariate balance, integer programming, unmeasured confounding, reading scores
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review