Cited by 1,810Markov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceData Analysis with R

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.

Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved Rˆ for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (with Discussion)

Open access
Vehtari, Aki, Gelman, Andrew, Simpson, Daniel, Carpenter, Bob, Bürkner, Paul-Christian·2021·Bayesian Analysis

Abstract

Markov chain Monte Carlo is a key computational tool in Bayesian statistics, but it can be challenging to monitor the convergence of an iterative stochastic algorithm. In this paper we show that the convergence diagnostic Rˆ of Gelman and Rubin (1992) has serious flaws. Traditional Rˆ will fail to correctly diagnose convergence failures when the chain has a heavy tail or when the variance varies across the chains. In this paper we propose an alternative rank-based diagnostic that fixes these problems. We also introduce a collection of quantile-based local efficiency measures, along with a practical approach for computing Monte Carlo error estimates for quantiles. We suggest that common trace plots should be replaced with rank plots from multiple chains. Finally, we give recommendations for how these methods should be used in practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/20-ba1221

Cites

45 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Blom, G. (1958). Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta-Variables. Wiley; New York.
  2. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., and Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis, third edition. CRC Press. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., and Bürkner, P.-C. (2020). “Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved Rˆ for Assessing Convergence of MCMC. Supplementary Material.” Bayesian Analysis. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C.
Affiliations
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Flatiron Institute (US)
Venue
Bayesian Analysis
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
667-718
ISSN
  • 1931-6690 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-0975
OpenAlex
W2920804790
Cited by
1,810
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 499 · 2025: 424 · 2024: 328 · 2023: 263 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 93
FWCI
96.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bayesian Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Data Analysis with R
Keywords
convergence diagnostics, Markov chain Monte Carlo, heavy-tailed distributions, Monte Carlo error estimation, trace plots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review