The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some Concepts of Dependence
Open accessAbstract
Problems involving dependent pairs of variables $(X, Y)$ have been studied most intensively in the case of bivariate normal distributions and of $2 \times 2$ tables. This is due primarily to the importance of these cases but perhaps partly also to the fact that they exhibit only a particularly simple form of dependence. (See Examples 9(i) and 10 in Section 7.) Studies involving the general case center mainly around two problems: (i) tests of independence; (ii) definition and estimation of measures of association. In most treatments of these problems, there occurs implicitly a concept which is of importance also in other contexts (for example, the evaluation of the performance of certain multiple decision procedures), the concept of positive (or negative) dependence or association. Tests of independence, for example those based on rank correlation, Kendall's $t$-statistic, or normal scores, are usually not omnibus tests (for a discussion of such tests see [4], [15] and [17], but designed to detect rather specific types of alternatives, namely those for which large values of $Y$ tend to be associated with large values of $X$ and small values of $Y$ with small values of $X$ (positive dependence) or the opposite case of negative dependence in which large values of one variable tend to be associated with small values of the other. Similarly, measures of association are typically designed to measure the degree of this kind of association. The purpose of the present paper is to give three successively stronger definitions of positive dependence, to investigate their consequences, explore the strength of each definition through a number of examples, and to give some statistical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach
Li, D. X. (2000) · The Journal of Fixed Income · doi:10.3905/jfi.2000.319253 · Cited by 1,257
Energy statistics: A class of statistics based on distances
Székely, G. J., & Rizzo, M. L. (2013) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2013.03.018 · Cited by 695
Sharp bounds on the variance in randomized experiments
Aronow, P. M., Green, D. P., & Lee, D. K. K. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1200 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehmann, E. L.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1966-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1137-1153
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2508109141
- Cited by
- 1,510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Concepts of Dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177699260
- The paper
- Lehmann, E. L. (1966). Some Concepts of Dependence. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177699260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.