The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximum Entropy for Hypothesis Formulation, Especially for Multidimensional Contingency Tables
Open accessAbstract
The principle of maximum entropy, together with some generalizations, is interpreted as a heuristic principle for the generation of null hypotheses. The main application is to $m$-dimensional population contingency tables, with the marginal totals given down to dimension $m - r$ ("restraints of the $r$th order"). The principle then leads to the null hypothesis of no "$r$th-order interaction." Significance tests are given for testing the hypothesis of no $r$th-order or higher-order interaction within the wider hypothesis of no $s$th-order or higher-order interaction, some cases of which have been treated by Bartlett and by Roy and Kastenbaum. It is shown that, if a complete set of $r$th-order restraints are given, then the hypothesis of the vanishing of all $r$th-order and higher-order interactions leads to a unique set of cell probabilities, if the restraints are consistent, but not only just consistent. This confirms and generalizes a recent conjecture due to Darroch. A kind of duality between maximum entropy and maximum likelihood is proved. Some relationships between maximum entropy, interactions, and Markov chains are proved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Cited by
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38 · Cited by 3,028
$I$-Divergence Geometry of Probability Distributions and Minimization Problems
Csiszar, I. (1975) · The Annals of Probability · doi:10.1214/aop/1176996454 · Cited by 1,645
The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Interactions among Multiple Classifications
Goodman, L. A. (1970) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1970.10481076 · Cited by 746
Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine
Good, I. J. (1966) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60418-0 · Cited by 703
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Good, I. J.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1963-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 911-934
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089611415
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum Entropy for Hypothesis Formulation, Especially for Multidimensional Contingency Tables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177704014
- The paper
- Good, I. J. (1963). Maximum Entropy for Hypothesis Formulation, Especially for Multidimensional Contingency Tables. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.