The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Modification of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test to Reduce the Sample Size
Open accessAbstract
The sequential probability ratio test is constructed as a sequential test of one simple hypothesis against another. In many instances a parametric form is assumed for the density or (discrete) probability function, and the two simple hypotheses are specified by two values of the parameter. The sequential probability ratio test has an optimum property for these two hypotheses, namely, given such a test there is no other test with at least as low probabilities of Type I and Type II errors and with smaller expected sample sizes under either or both of the two hypotheses. Usually, however, one is interested in the performance of the procedure for more values of the parameter than these two. A disadvantage of the sequential probability ratio test is that in general the expected sample size is relatively large for values of the parameter between the two specified ones; that is, in cases in which one does not care greatly which decision is taken, a large number of observations is expected. The question is how to reduce the expected sample size for values of the parameter when this tends to be large. In this paper we consider a special case of the problem, when the distribution is normal with known variance and the parameter of interest is the mean. The sequential probability ratio test in this case consists in taking observations sequentially and after each observation is taken comparing the sum of the observations (referred to a suitable origin) with two constants. In this study the two constants are replaced by two linear functions of the number of observations taken, and the taking of observations is truncated (Section 2). Approximations to the operating characteristic (or power function) and the average sample size number are given (Section 4 and 5). Computations for two cases of special interest show a considerable decrease in average sample size at parameter values between the two specified ones (Section 3). The problem is studied by replacing the sum of observations by the Wiener stochastic process (of a continuous time parameter); this can be thought of intuitively as interpolating between observations in a manner consistent with the addition of independent random variables. For this procedure we calculate exactly the operating characteristic, the distribution of observation time, the expected observation time, and related probabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials
Kim, K. (2001) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00127-6 · Cited by 706
Chu, C.-S. J., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1996) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171955 · Cited by 386
A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models
Shinn, M., Lam, N. H., & Murray, J. D. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.56938 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, T. W.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1960-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-197
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017693984
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Modification of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test to Reduce the Sample Size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177705996
- The paper
- Anderson, T. W. (1960). A Modification of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test to Reduce the Sample Size. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.