The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces
Open accessAbstract
Suppose that a relationship $\eta = \varphi(\xi_1, \xi_2, \cdots, \xi_k)$ exists between a response $\eta$ and the levels $\xi_1, \xi_2, \cdots, \xi_k$ of $k$ quantitative variables or factors, and that nothing is assumed about the function $\varphi$ except that, within a limited region of immediate interest in the space of the variables, it can be adequately represented by a polynomial of degree $d$. A $k$-dimensional experimental design of order $d$ is a set of $N$ points in the $k$-dimensional space of the variables so chosen that, using the data generated by making one observation at each of the points, all the coefficients in the $d$th degree polynomial can be estimated. The problem of selecting practically useful designs is discussed, and in this connection the concept of the variance function for an experimental design is introduced. Reasons are advanced for preferring designs having a "spherical" or nearly "spherical" variance function. Such designs insure that the estimated response has a constant variance at all points which are the same distance from the center of the design. Designs having this property are called rotatable designs. When such arrangements are submitted to rotation about the fixed center, the variances and covariances of the estimated coefficients in the fitted series remain constant. Rotatable designs having satisfactory variance functions are given for $d = 1, 2$; and $k = 2, 3, \cdots, \infty$. Blocking arrangements are derived. The simplification in the form of the confidence region for a stationary point resulting from the use of a second order rotatable design is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Khuri, A. I., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.73 · Cited by 2,113
Sequential Application of Simplex Designs in Optimisation and Evolutionary Operation
Spendley, W., Hext, G. R., & Himsworth, F. R. (1962) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1962.10490033 · Cited by 1,379
Statistical designs and response surface techniques for the optimization of chromatographic systems
Ferreira, S. L. C., Bruns, R. E., da Silva, E. G. P., dos Santos, W. N. L., Quintella, C. M., David, J. M., de Andrade, J. B., Breitkreitz, M. C., Jardim, I. C. S. F., & Neto, B. B. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.051 · Cited by 616
Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production
Shoda, M., & Sugano, Y. (2005) · Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02931175 · Cited by 375
Mahdi, J. M., Lohrasbi, S., Ganji, D. D., & Nsofor, E. C. (2019) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.038 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Box, G. E. P., & Hunter, J. S.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1957-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 195-241
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063241545
- Cited by
- 1,430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177707047
- The paper
- Box, G. E. P., & Hunter, J. S. (1957). Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177707047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.