The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Saddlepoint Approximations in Statistics
Open accessAbstract
It is often required to approximate to the distribution of some statistic whose exact distribution cannot be conveniently obtained. When the first few moments are known, a common procedure is to fit a law of the Pearson or Edgeworth type having the same moments as far as they are given. Both these methods are often satisfactory in practice, but have the drawback that errors in the "tail" regions of the distribution are sometimes comparable with the frequencies themselves. The Edgeworth approximation in particular notoriously can assume negative values in such regions. The characteristic function of the statistic may be known, and the difficulty is then the analytical one of inverting a Fourier transform explicitly. In this paper we show that for a statistic such as the mean of a sample of size $n$, or the ratio of two such means, a satisfactory approximation to its probability density, when it exists, can be obtained nearly always by the method of steepest descents. This gives an asymptotic expansion in powers of $n^{-1}$ whose dominant term, called the saddlepoint approximation, has a number of desirable features. The error incurred by its use is $O(n^{-1})$ as against the more usual $O(n^{-1/2})$ associated with the normal approximation. Moreover it is shown that in an important class of cases the relative error of the approximation is uniformly $O(n^{-1})$ over the whole admissible range of the variable. The method of steepest descents was first used systematically by Debye for Bessel functions of large order (Watson [17]) and was introduced by Darwin and Fowler (Fowler [9]) into statistical mechanics, where it has remained an indispensable tool. Apart from the work of Jeffreys [12] and occasional isolated applications by other writers (e.g. Cox [2]), the technique has been largely ignored by writers on statistical theory. In the present paper, distributions having probability densities are discussed first, the saddlepoint approximation and its associated asymptotic expansion being obtained for the probability density of the mean $\bar{x}$ of a sample of $n$. It is shown how the steepest descents technique is related to an alternative method used by Khinchin [14] and, in a slightly different context, by Cramer [5]. General conditions are established under which the relative error of the saddlepoint approximation is $O(n^{-1})$ uniformly for all admissible $\bar{x}$, with a corresponding result for the asymptotic expansion. The case of discrete variables is briefly discussed, and finally the method is used for approximating to the distribution of ratios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spatial Contact Models for Ecological and Epidemic Spread
Mollison, D. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01627.x · Cited by 758
On a formula for the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator
BARNDORFF-NIELSEN, O. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.2.343 · Cited by 466
Saddlepoint Methods and Statistical Inference
Reid, N. (1988) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177012906 · Cited by 337
Predictive Likelihood: A Review
Bjornstad, J. F. (1990) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177012175 · Cited by 156
Bayesian Multilevel Analysis and MCMC
Draper, D. (2007) · Handbook of Multilevel Analysis · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73186-5_2 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Daniels, H. E.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1954-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 631-650
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049361783
- Cited by
- 1,106
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Saddlepoint Approximations in Statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177728652
- The paper
- Daniels, H. E. (1954). Saddlepoint Approximations in Statistics. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728652
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.