The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moments and Distributions of Estimates of Population Parameters from Fragmentary Samples
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Enders, C., & Bandalos, D. (2001) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0803_5 · Cited by 4,978
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289460 · Cited by 432
What Do We Do with Missing Data? Some Options for Analysis of Incomplete Data
Raghunathan, T. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.102802.124410 · Cited by 429
Incomplete Data in Generalized Linear Models
Ibrahim, J. G. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10474938 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilks, S. S.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1932-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 163-195
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019549276
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moments and Distributions of Estimates of Population Parameters from Fragmentary Samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177732885
- The paper
- Wilks, S. S. (1932). Moments and Distributions of Estimates of Population Parameters from Fragmentary Samples. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.