Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Some Limit Theorems for Empirical Processes

Open access
Gine, Evarist, Zinn, Joel·1984·The Annals of Probability

Abstract

In this paper we provide a general framework for the study of the central limit theorem (CLT) for empirical processes indexed by uniformly bounded families of functions $\mathscr{F}$. From this we obtain essentially all known results for the CLT in this case; we improve Dudley's (1982) theorem on entropy with bracketing and Kolcinskii's (1981) CLT under random entropy conditions. One of our main results is that a combinatorial condition together with the existence of the limiting Gaussian process are necessary and sufficient for the CLT for a class of sets (modulo a measurability condition). The case of unbounded $\mathscr{F}$ is also considered; a general CLT as well as necessary and sufficient conditions for the law of large numbers are obtained in this case. The results for empiricals also yield some new CLT's in $C\lbrack 0, 1\rbrack$ and $D\lbrack 0, 1\rbrack$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aop/1176993138

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Gine, E., & Zinn, J.
Venue
The Annals of Probability
Published
1984-11-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
ISSN
0091-1798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054098737
Cited by
432
References
0
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Limit Theorems for Empirical Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aop/1176993138
The paper
Gine, E., & Zinn, J. (1984). Some Limit Theorems for Empirical Processes. The Annals of Probability. https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176993138

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.