The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian analysis of mixture models with an unknown number of components—an alternative to reversible jump methods
Open accessAbstract
Richardson and Green present a method of performing a Bayesian analysis of data from a finite mixture distribution with an unknown number of components. Their method is a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach, which makes use of the “reversible jump” methodology described by Green. We describe an alternative MCMC method which views the parameters of the model as a (marked) point process, extending methods suggested by Ripley to create a Markov birth-death process with an appropriate stationary distribution. Our method is easy to implement, even in the case of data in more than one dimension, and we illustrate it on both univariate and bivariate data. There appears to be considerable potential for applying these ideas to other contexts, as an alternative to more general reversible jump methods, and we conclude with a brief discussion of how this might be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Ripley, B. D. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01615.x · Cited by 2,511
Cited by
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Self-citationA Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
Bayesian Methods for Hidden Markov Models: Recursive Computing in the 21st Century
Scott, S. L. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502753479464 · Cited by 517
Marginal Likelihood Estimation via Power Posteriors
Friel, N., & Pettitt, A. N. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00650.x · Cited by 353
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Computing Bayes Factors: A Comparative Review
Han, C., & Carlin, B. P. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753208780 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephens, M.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-74
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1511747216
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian analysis of mixture models with an unknown number of components—an alternative to reversible jump methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1016120364
- The paper
- Stephens, M. (2000). Bayesian analysis of mixture models with an unknown number of components—an alternative to reversible jump methods. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1016120364
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.