Wedgelets: nearly minimax estimation of edges
Open accessAbstract
We study a simple “horizon model” for the problem of recovering an image from noisy data; in this model the image has an edge with $\alpha$-Hölder regularity. Adopting the viewpoint of computational harmonic analysis, we develop an overcomplete collection of atoms called wedgelets, dyadically organized indicator functions with a variety of locations, scales and orientations. The wedgelet representation provides nearly optimal representations of objects in the horizon model, as measured by minimax description length. We show how to rapidly compute a wedgelet approximation to noisy data by finding a special edgelet-decorated recursive partition which minimizes a complexity-penalized sum of squares. This estimate, using sufficient subpixel resolution, achieves nearly the minimax mean-squared error in the horizon model. In fact, the method is adaptive in the sense that it achieves nearly the minimax risk for any value of the unknown degree of regularity of the horizon, $1 \leq \alpha \leq 2$. Wedgelet analysis and denoising may be used successfully outside the horizon model. We study images modelled as indicators of star-shaped sets with smooth boundaries and show that complexity-penalized wedgelet partitioning achieves nearly the minimax risk in that setting also.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The wedgelet compression scheme uses the information that the primary circle consists of frequently occurring patches to obtain a compression scheme.
“the wedgelet compression scheme (Donoho 1999) uses the information that the primary circle in our description consists of frequently occurring patches to obtain an interesting compression scheme.”
From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Donoho 1999
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321 · see citing works
Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms
Candès, E., Demanet, L., Donoho, D., & Ying, L. (2006) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/05064182x · Cited by 2,573 · see citing works
Self-citationSparse Representation for Color Image Restoration
Mairal, J., Elad, M., & Sapiro, G. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.911828 · Cited by 1,716 · see citing works
Sparse geometric image representations with bandelets
Le Pennec, E., & Mallat, S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.843753 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data
Carlsson, G. (2014) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492914000051 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Tetrolet transform: A new adaptive Haar wavelet algorithm for sparse image representation
Krommweh, J. (2010) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2010.02.011 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
- Authors
- Donoho, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Donoho, David L.
- ORCID
- Donoho, David L.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 859-897
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-8966
- OpenAlex
- W2109504624
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Statistics (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9505151)
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Keywords
- edge detection, image denoising, minimax estimation, Hölder regularity, overcomplete representations, recursive partitioning, star-shaped sets, sub-pixel resolution, adaptive estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review