The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some hypothesis tests for the covariance matrix when the dimension is large compared to the sample size
Open accessAbstract
This paper analyzes whether standard covariance matrix tests work when dimensionality is large, and in particular larger than sample size. In the latter case, the singularity of the sample covariance matrix makes likelihood ratio tests degenerate, but other tests based on quadratic forms of sample covariance matrix eigenvalues remain well-defined. We study the consistency property and limiting distribution of these tests as dimensionality and sample size go to infinity together, with their ratio converging to a finite nonzero limit. We find that the existing test for sphericity is robust against high dimensionality, but not the test for equality of the covariance matrix to a given matrix. For the latter test, we develop a new correction to the existing test statistic that makes it robust against high dimensionality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shrinkage Algorithms for MMSE Covariance Estimation
Chen, Y., Wiesel, A., Eldar, Y. C., & Hero, A. O. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2053029 · Cited by 567
Tests for High-Dimensional Covariance Matrices
Chen, S. X., Zhang, L.-X., & Zhong, P.-S. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09560 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1081-1102
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005263452
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some hypothesis tests for the covariance matrix when the dimension is large compared to the sample size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1031689018
- The paper
- Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2002). Some hypothesis tests for the covariance matrix when the dimension is large compared to the sample size. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1031689018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.