The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes
Open accessAbstract
Let $\mathbf{B} = (N_1, \cdots, N_k)$ be a multivariate counting process and let $\mathscr{F}_t$ be the collection of all events observed on the time interval $\lbrack 0, t\rbrack.$ The intensity process is given by $\Lambda_i(t) = \lim_{h \downarrow 0} \frac{1}{h}E(N_i(t + h) - N_i(t) \mid \mathscr{F}_t)\quad i = 1, \cdots, k.$ We give an application of the recently developed martingale-based approach to the study of $\mathbf{N}$ via $\mathbf{\Lambda}.$ A statistical model is defined by letting $\Lambda_i(t) = \alpha_i(t)Y_i(t), i = 1, \cdots, k,$ where $\mathbf{\alpha} = (\alpha_1, \cdots, \alpha_k)$ is an unknown nonnegative function while $\mathbf{Y} = (Y_1, \cdots, Y_k),$ together with $\mathbf{N},$ is a process observable over a certain time interval. Special cases are time-continuous Markov chains on finite state spaces, birth and death processes and models for survival analysis with censored data. The model is termed nonparametric when $\mathbf{\alpha}$ is allowed to vary arbitrarily except for regularity conditions. The existence of complete and sufficient statistics for this model is studied. An empirical process estimating $\beta_i(t) = \int^t_0 \alpha_i(s) ds$ is given and studied by means of the theory of stochastic integrals. This empirical process is intended for plotting purposes and it generalizes the empirical cumulative hazard rate from survival analysis and is related to the product limit estimator. Consistency and weak convergence results are given. Tests for comparison of two counting processes, generalizing the two sample rank tests, are defined and studied. Finally, an application to a set of biological data is given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk
Gray, R. J. (1988) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176350951 · Cited by 4,960
Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976 · Cited by 4,419
Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Across a Biological Gradient of Serum Hepatitis B Virus DNA Level
Chen, C.-J. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.65 · Cited by 3,140
The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates
Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094928 · Cited by 1,700
Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial
Hugosson, J., Carlsson, S., Aus, G., Bergdahl, S., Khatami, A., Lodding, P., Pihl, C.-G., Stranne, J., Holmberg, E., & Lilja, H. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70146-7 · Cited by 936
Metadata
- Authors
- Aalen, O.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1978-07-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085107973
- Cited by
- 1,483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1176344247
- The paper
- Aalen, O. (1978). Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.