Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polya Trees and Random Distributions

Open access
Mauldin, R. Daniel, Sudderth, William D., Williams, S. C.·1992·The Annals of Statistics

Abstract

Trees of Polya urns are used to generate sequences of exchangeable random variables. By a theorem of de Finetti each such sequence is a mixture of independent, identically distributed variables and the mixing measure can be viewed as a prior on distribution functions. The collection of these Polya tree priors forms a convenient conjugate family which was mentioned by Ferguson and includes the Dirichlet processes of Ferguson. Unlike Dirichlet processes, Polya tree priors can assign probability 1 to the class of continuous distributions. This property and a few others are investigated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aos/1176348766

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Mauldin, R. D., Sudderth, W. D., & Williams, S. C.
Venue
The Annals of Statistics
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
ISSN
0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074178102
Cited by
216
References
0
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polya Trees and Random Distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1176348766
The paper
Mauldin, R. D., Sudderth, W. D., & Williams, S. C. (1992). Polya Trees and Random Distributions. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176348766

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.