Cited by 583Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Breakdown Properties of Location Estimates Based on Halfspace Depth and Projected Outlyingness

Open access
Donoho, David L., Gasko, Miriam·1992·The Annals of Statistics

Abstract

We describe multivariate generalizations of the median, trimmed mean and $W$ estimates. The estimates are based on a geometric construction related to "projection pursuit." They are both affine equivariant (coordinate-free) and have high breakdown point. The generalization of the median has a breakdown point of at least $1/(d + 1)$ in dimension $d$ and the breakdown point can be as high as $1/3$ under symmetry. In contrast, various estimators based on rejecting apparent outliers and taking the mean of the remaining observations have breakdown points not larger than $1/(d + 1)$ in dimension $d$.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aos/1176348890

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The breakdown floor is matched up to a dimensional constant only by the (intractable) Tukey halfspace median.

    “the breakdown floor, in turn, is matched up to a dimensional constant only by the (intractable) Tukey halfspace median.”

    From RoPoLL: Robust Panel of LLM Judges (2026) · cites this paper as Donoho and Gasko, 1992

    The opening summary (p. 1) gives the halfspace-depth median a breakdown point of at least 1/(d + 1), and §5.3 (p. 13) says the paper’s estimators are computationally impractical in higher dimensions. But “only” is not supported: Proposition 3.5 (p. 9) establishes high breakdown for an outlyingness-weighted mean, and §5.2 (p. 12) describes another method with breakdown nearly 1/2. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The minimax-optimal estimator on the breakdown floor is the Tukey halfspace median.

    “The minimax-optimal estimator on the breakdown floor is the Tukey halfspace median (Tukey, 1975;Donoho and Gasko, 1992)”

    From RoPoLL: Robust Panel of LLM Judges (2026) · cites this paper as Donoho and Gasko, 1992

    The introduction (p. 1) identifies the halfspace-depth generalization of the median and gives its breakdown-point lower bound of 1/(d + 1). It does not establish that this estimator is minimax-optimal; the discussion of breakdown results (p. 9) instead says the outlyingness-weighted mean has better breakdown properties and is nearly best possible. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The minimax-optimal estimator on the breakdown floor is the Tukey halfspace median, whose exact computation is NP-hard for d ≥ 3; the smoothed-depth estimator of Chen et al. (2018) matches the σα floor in sub-exponential time.

    “The minimax-optimal estimator on the breakdown floor is the Tukey halfspace median (Tukey, 1975;Donoho and Gasko, 1992), whose exact computation is NP-hard for d ≥ 3 (Johnson and Preparata, 1978;Aloupis, 2006); the smoothed-depth estimator of Chen et al. (2018) matches the σα floor in sub-exponential time.”

    From RoPoLL: Robust Panel of LLM Judges (2026) · cites this paper as Donoho and Gasko, 1992

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. DoNoHo, D. L. and HuBER, P. J. (1982). The notion of breakdown point. In A Festschrift for Erich L. Lehmann in Honor of His Sixty-fifth Birthday (P. J. Bickel, K. A. Doksum and J. L. Hodges, Jr., eds.) 157–184. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.
  2. HuBER, P. J. (1977). Robust covariances. In Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics II (S. S. Gupta and D. S. Moore, eds.) 165–191. Academic, New York.
  3. MosTELLER, C. F. and TuKEY, J. W. (1977). Data Analysis and Regression. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
  4. PoLLARD, D. (1984). Convergence of Stochastic Processes. Springer, New York.
  5. RoussEEUw, P. (1985). Multivariate estimation with high breakdown point. In Mathematical Statistics and Applications, Vol. B (W. Grossman, G. Ch. Pflug, I. Vincze and W. Wertz, eds.) 283–297. Reidel, Dordrecht.
  6. RoCKEFELLAR, R. T. (1970). Convex Analysis. Princeton Univ. Press.
  7. RoussEEUw, P. J. and LEROY, A. M. (1987). Robust Regression and Outliner Detection. Wiley, New York.
  8. RoussEEUw, P. J. and YoHAI, V. (1984). Robust regression by means of S-estimators. Robust and Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Lecture Notes in Statist. 26 256–272. Springer, New York.
  9. STAHEL, W. A. (1981). Robust estimation: infinitesimal optimality and covariance matrix estimators. Ph.D. thesis, ETH, Zurich (in German).
  10. TuKEY, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donoho, D. L., & Gasko, M.
Venue
The Annals of Statistics
Published
1992-12-01
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
1803-1827
ISSN
  • 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8966
OpenAlex
W2039892753
Cited by
583
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 27
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
halfspace depth, breakdown point, multivariate location estimation, projection pursuit, affine equivariance, trimmed mean, robust statistics, outliers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review