Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Adaptive Treatment Allocation and the Multi-Armed Bandit Problem

Open access
Lai, Tze Leung·1987·The Annals of Statistics

Abstract

A class of simple adaptive allocation rules is proposed for the problem (often called the "multi-armed bandit problem") of sampling $x_1, \cdots x_N$ sequentially from $k$ populations with densities belonging to an exponential family, in order to maximize the expected value of the sum $S_N = x_1 + \cdots + x_N$. These allocation rules are based on certain upper confidence bounds, which are developed from boundary crossing theory, for the $k$ population parameters. The rules are shown to be asymptotically optimal as $N \rightarrow \infty$ from both Bayesian and frequentist points of view. Monte Carlo studies show that they also perform very well for moderate values of the horizon $N$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aos/1176350495

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Lai, T. L.
Venue
The Annals of Statistics
Published
1987-09-01
Volume
15
Issue
3
ISSN
0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973885534
Cited by
279
References
0
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive Treatment Allocation and the Multi-Armed Bandit Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1176350495
The paper
Lai, T. L. (1987). Adaptive Treatment Allocation and the Multi-Armed Bandit Problem. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176350495

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.