Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hanson-Wright inequality and sub-gaussian concentration

Open access
Rudelson, Mark, Vershynin, Roman·2013·Electronic Communications in Probability

Abstract

In this expository note, we give a modern proof of Hanson-Wright inequality for quadratic forms in sub-gaussian random variables.We deduce a useful concentration inequality for sub-gaussian random vectors.Two examples are given to illustrate these results: a concentration of distances between random vectors and subspaces, and a bound on the norms of products of random and deterministic matrices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/ecp.v18-2865

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Rudelson, M., & Vershynin, R.
Venue
Electronic Communications in Probability
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
18
Issue
none
Pages
1-9
ISSN
1083-589X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032291279
Cited by
502
References
9
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hanson-Wright inequality and sub-gaussian concentration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/ecp.v18-2865
The paper
Rudelson, M., & Vershynin, R. (2013). Hanson-Wright inequality and sub-gaussian concentration. Electronic Communications in Probability. https://doi.org/10.1214/ecp.v18-2865

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.