CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black Memory versus State Memory: Notes toward a Method

Hanchard, Michael·2008·Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism
DOI 10.1215/-12-2-45
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In addition to providing some conceptual and theoretical cues from fiction, literary and visual criticism, history, and philosophy that treat the subject of memory, this paper provides an outline of a critical method to distinguish among various deployments of black memory. This paper highlights and explores some of the tensions between state and popular memory in the discourses of transnational black politics, as well as in the development and circulation of state sanctioned national history within national societies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/-12-2-45

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Archaeology continues to serve as a metaphor for retrieval, reassembly, archiving, and remembering what has been forgotten, erased, or buried.

    “As in Schomburg's day, archaeology continues to serve as a metaphor for retrieval, reassembly, archiving, and remembering what has been forgotten, erased, or buried (Hanchard 2008).”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Hanchard 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hanchard, M.
Venue
Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
45-62
ISSN
  • 0799-0537
  • 1534-6714
DOI
10.1215/-12-2-45
Cited by
51
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review