The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RACIAL IDENTIFICATION BY SPEECH
Abstract
American Speech - Volume 75, Number 4, Winter 2000
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Linguistic profiling, for instance, can discriminate against speakers of a dialect considered non-standard (Baugh 2000; Loudermilk 2015).”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Baugh 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 1,245
MIDDLE-CLASS AFRICAN AMERICANS: REACTIONS AND ATTITUDES TOWARD AFRICAN AMERICAN ENGLISH
Rahman, J. (2008) · American Speech · doi:10.1215/00031283-2008-009 · Cited by 52
Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation
Loudermilk, B. C. (2015) · IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society · doi:10.1075/impact.39.06lou · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- BAUGH, J.
- Corresponding author
- BAUGH, JOHN
- Venue
- American Speech
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 362-364
- ISSN
- 0003-1283 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-2133
- OpenAlex
- W2091649774
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Speech (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Keywords
- racial identification, speech, speech perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
