Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51Linguistic Variation and MorphologyHearing Impairment and CommunicationLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LEXICAL VARIATION IN AFRICAN AMERICAN AND WHITE SIGNING

LUCAS, CEIL, BAYLEY, ROBERT, REED, RUTH, WULF, ALYSSA·2001·American Speech
DOI 10.1215/00031283-76-4-339
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

American Speech - Volume 76, Number 4, Winter 2001

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00031283-76-4-339

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Aramburo, Anthony. 1989. “Sociolinguistic Aspects of the Black Deaf Community.” In The Sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community, ed. Ceil Lucas,103-19. San Diego: Academic. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Asante, Molefi K. 1990. “African Elements in African American English.” In Africanisms in American Culture, ed. Joseph E. Holloway, 19-23. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
  3. Collins, Steven, and Karen Petronio. 1998. “What Happens in Tactile ASL?” In Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze:Language Use in Deaf Communities, ed. Ceil Lucas,18-37. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet Univ. Press.
  4. DASL. A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. 1965. By William C. Stokoe,Jr., Dorothy C. Casterline, and Carl G. Croneberg. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet Press.
  5. Frishberg, Nancy. 1975. “Arbitrariness and Iconicity: Historical Change in American Sign Language.”Language51:696-719. · DOI
  6. Lucas, Ceil, Robert Bayley, and Clayton Valli. 2001.Sociolinguistic Variation in American Sign Language. Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities Series 7. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet Univ. Press. · DOI
  7. Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Observing and Analyzing Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
  8. Nover, Stephen M. 1995. “American Sign Language and English in Deaf Education.” In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, ed. Ceil Lucas, 109-63. Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities Series 1. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet Univ. Press.
  9. Padden, Carol, and Tom Humphries. 1988.Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press. · DOI
  10. Ramsey, Claire L. 1989. “Language Planning in Deaf Education.” In The Sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community, ed. Ceil Lucas, 123-26. San Diego: Academic. · DOI
  11. Shroyer, Edgar, and Susan Shroyer. 1984.Signs across America: A Look at Regional Differences in American Sign Language. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet College Press.
  12. Woodward, James C., and Susan DeSantis. 1977.“Two to One It Happens: Dynamic Phonology in Two Sign Languages.”Sign Language Studies17:329-46. · DOI
  13. Woodward, James C., Carol J. Erting, and Susanna Oliver.1976. “Facing and Hand(l)ing Variation in American Sign Language.” Sign Language Studies10: 43-52. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
LUCAS, C., BAYLEY, R., REED, R., & WULF, A.
ORCID
BAYLEY, ROBERT
Venue
American Speech
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
339-360
ISSN
  • 0003-1283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-2133
DOI
10.1215/00031283-76-4-339
OpenAlex
W2031538630
Cited by
51
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Speech (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Keywords
lexical variation, sign language, sign language lexicon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.