Cited by 1Latin American history and cultureHistorical Geography and CartographyIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Negotiated Cartographies in the Relaciones Geográficas de Indias: The Descripción de la provincia de Yauyos Toda (1586)

Abstract

In the sixteenth century, the Spanish Crown moved to compile a comprehensive knowledge of its European and American landholdings to materialize the idea of a unified and civilized empire. Peninsular officials sent questionnaires to the Americas, including a request for “paintings” of the urban and natural landscape, without much detail on the project’s guidelines. The varied responses sent back to Spain are known as the Relaciones Geográficas de Indias. This essay investigates the cultural negotiations and potential for Indigenous representations of “depth of place” embedded in one such painting from the Peruvian highland region of Yauyos and Huarochirí. By analyzing colonial-period sources and using spatial modeling, this research underscores the different portrayals of space coexisting on the map. By comparing the painting with contemporary colonial sources, this article examines ongoing negotiations of natural and urban landscapes and an emerging view that synthesized different readings of the same landscape in a period of colonial dislocation and reinvention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00141801-10443465

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Barraza Lescano, 2005, Las fuentes del Jesuita Anónimo, Revista histórica, 42, 343
  2. Dulanto, 2014, Time and the Other: The Early Colonial Mythohistorical Landscapes of the Huarochirí Manuscript, 141
  3. Espinoza, 1997, La etnía Huarochirí en la era del Tahuantinsuyu, Sequilao, 23
  4. Gartner, 1998, Mapmaking in the Central Andes, 257
  5. Guchte, 1992, Invention and Assimilation. European Engravings as Models for the Drawings of Felipe Guaman Poma de Ayala, 92
  6. Hyslop, 2014, Qhapaqñan: El sistema vial inkaico
  7. Jiménez de la Espada, 1881, Relaciones geográficas de Indias: Perú
  8. Jiménez de la Espada, 1965, Relaciones geográficas de Indias: Perú, por Marcos Jiménez de La Espada
  9. Mundy, 2011, Hybrid Space, 51
  10. Salomon, 2008, Huarochirí Manuscript, 296
  11. Salomon, 1991, The Huarochirí Manuscript: A Testament of Ancient and Colonial Andean Religion
  12. Spalding, 2012, El diario histórico de Sebastián Franco de Melo: El Levantamiento de Huarochirí de 1750
  13. Tobler, 1993, Three Presentations on Geographical Analysis and Modeling: Non-isotropic Geographic Modeling

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garavito, C. H., & Menéndez, G. O.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Venue
Ethnohistory
Published
2023-07-01
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
351-384
ISSN
  • 0014-1801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-5477
OpenAlex
W4386172448
Cited by
1
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnohistory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
Yauyos, Huarochirí, colonial cartography, landscape painting, Spanish Empire, sixteenth-century Spanish America, Peruvian highlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review