Cited by 76Indigenous Cultures and HistoryMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Memory Lands: King Philip's War and the Place of Violence in the Northeast

Nelson, John William·2019·Ethnohistory

Abstract

"DeLucia grounds her study of one of the most devastating conflicts between Native Americans and European settlers in early America in five specific places that were directly affected by the crisis, spanning the Northeast as well as the Atlantic world. She examines the war's effects on the everyday lives and collective mentalities of the region's diverse Native and Euro-American communities over the course of several centuries, focusing on persistent struggles over land and water, sovereignty, resistance, cultural memory, and intercultural interactions"--Amazon.com

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00141801-7300132

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 76

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, John William
Venue
Ethnohistory
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
385-386
ISSN
  • 0014-1801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-5477
OpenAlex
W2935588674
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 2
FWCI
27.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnohistory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
King Philip's War, memory, violence, colonial New England, Native American resistance, Wampanoag, historiography, place and memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review