The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Truth Governs Belief
Abstract
Research Article| October 01 2003 How Truth Governs Belief Nishi Shah Nishi Shah Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2003) 112 (4): 447–482. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-112-4-447 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Nishi Shah; How Truth Governs Belief. The Philosophical Review 1 October 2003; 112 (4): 447–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-112-4-447 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsThe Philosophical Review Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Cornell University2003 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Educating for Intellectual Virtue: A Critique from Action Guidance
Kotzee, B., Carter, J. A., & Siegel, H. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2019.10 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, N.
- Venue
- The Philosophical Review
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-482
- ISSN
- 0031-8108 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1470
- OpenAlex
- W2013116704
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 104.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
