CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America

Svampa, Maristella·2015·South Atlantic Quarterly
DOI 10.1215/00382876-2831290
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Over the past decade, a significant number of Latin American countries have questioned the Washington consensus and financial valorization. In doing so, they have moved into the paradigm of the commodities consensus and the large-scale exportation of raw materials. These processes have led to a series of important political and economic changes, while also opening a new phase of conflict linked to the appropriation and dispossession of territories and natural resources. Starting from a regional scenario pierced with strong tensions and asymmetries, this article examines the current phase of capital accumulation in Latin America, focusing on critical concepts such as neoextractivism and bad development. It presents a particular reading of environmental conflict, linked to processes of dispossession, enclosure of the common, and the deepening of extractivism by Latin American progressive governments. The article also explores some prescriptive categories spanning contemporary Latin American thought and debate linked to the environmentalization of struggles. These concepts include buen vivir (living well), the rights of nature, and the commons. To conclude, it briefly reviews the debate around transition and postextractivism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00382876-2831290

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Acosta Alberto . 2010b. “Toward the Universal Declaration of Rights of Nature: Thoughts for Action.” AFESE Journal, August24. therightsofnature.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Toward-the-Universal-Declaration-of-Rights-of-Nature-Alberto-Acosta.pdf.
  2. Brand, 2013, Crisis and Continuity of Capitalist Society-Nature Relationships: The Imperial Mode of Living and the Limits to Environmental Governance, Review of International Political Economy, 20, 687, 10.1080/09692290.2012.691077 · DOI
  3. Colectivo Voces de Alerta, 2011, 15 mitos y realidades sobre la minería transnacional en Argentina (Fifteen Myths and Realities about Transnational Mining in Argentina)
  4. Dumont, 1982, El mal desarrollo en América Latina (México, Colombia, Brasil) (Bad Development in Latin America [Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil])
  5. Francke, 2011, “Transiciones: Post extractivismo y alternativas al extractivismo en el Perú” (“Transitions: Postextractivism and Alternatives to Extractivism in Peru”), 131
  6. Gudynas, 2010, The New Extractivism of the Twenty-First Century: Ten Urgent Theses about Extractivism in Relation to Current South American Progressivism
  7. Gudynas, 2011, “Los derechos de la Naturaleza en serio” (“The Rights of Nature Seriously”), 239
  8. Gudynas, 2011, “Más allá del nuevo extractivismo: Transiciones sostenibles y alternativas al desarrollo” (“Beyond the New Extractivism: Sustainable Transitions and Alternatives to Development”), 379
  9. Lang, 2013, Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America
  10. Leff, 2006, “La ecología política en América Latina: Un campo en construcción” (“Political Ecology in Latin America: A Field under Construction”)
  11. León, 2009, “Cambiar la economía para cambiar la vida: Desafìos de una economía para la vida” (“Changing the Economy to Change Life: Challenges for an Economy in the Service of Life”), 63
  12. Linsalata Lucía . 2011. “De comunarios y vecinos: El ethos comunal en la política boliviana; Una reflexión acerca de las formas comunales de la política en el mundo aymara contemporáneo” (“Of Community Members and Neighbors: The Communal Ethos in Bolivian Politics; A Reflection on the Communal Forms of Politics in the Contemporary Aymara World”). Master’s thesis, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
  13. Machado Aráoz, 2012, “Naturaleza mineral: Una ecología política del colonialismo moderno” (“Mineral Nature: A Political Ecology of Modern Colonialism”)
  14. Maquet, 2013, Mitos y realidades de la minería en el Perú. Una guia para desmontar el imaginario extractivista (Myths and Realities of Mining in Peru: A Guide to Removing the Extractivist Imagination)
  15. Martínez-Alier, 2003, The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation
  16. Pascual Rodriguez Marta López Yayo Herrero . 2010. “Ecofeminismo, una propuesta para repensar el presente y construir el futuro” (“Ecofeminism, a Proposal for Rethinking the Present and Constructing a Future”). Boletín ECOS (Bulletin ECOS), no. 10. www.fuhem.es/media/cdv/file/biblioteca/Boletin_ECOS/10/ecofeminismo_propuesta_repensar_presente.pdf.
  17. Santos, 2007, La reinvención del estado y el estado plurinacional (The Reinvention of the State and the Plurinational State)
  18. Shiva, 1988, Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development
  19. Subirats, 2011, “Algunos apuntes sobre la relación entre los bienes communes y la economía social y solidaria” (“Some Notes on the Relation between Common Goods and the Social and Solidarity Economy”), Otra Economía, revista Latinoamericana de Economía Social y Solidaria (Another Economy: Latin American Journal of the Social and Solidarity Economy), 5, 195
  20. Svampa, 2011, “Modelo de desarrollo y cuestión ambiental en América Latina: Categorías y escenarios en disputa” (“The Development Model and Environmental Question in Latin America: Categories and Scenes in Dispute”), In Wanderley, El desarrollo en cuestión (Development in Question), 411
  21. Svampa, 2012, “Pensar el desarrollo desde América Latina” (“Thinking Development from Latin America”), 17
  22. Svampa Maristella . 2013a. “Commons beyond Development: The Strategic Value of the Commons, as a Paradigm Shift.” In Economics and the Common(s): From Seed Form to Core Paradigm; A Report on an International Conference on the Future of the Commons, 9–12. Conference organized by the Heinrich Böll Foundation and Commons Strategies Group. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation. www.boell.de/sites/default/files/ecc_report_final.pdf.
  23. Svampa, 2014, Maldesarrollo: La Argentina del extractivismo y del despojo (Bad Development: The Argentina of Extractivism and Plunder), 10.2307/j.ctvm7bcs8 · DOI
  24. Tortosa, 2011, Maldesarrollo y mal vivir: Pobreza y violencia a escala mundial (Bad Development and Bad Living: Poverty and Violence on a Global Scale)
  25. Unceta Satrústegui, 2009, “Desarrollo, subdesarrollo, maldesarrollo y postdesarrollo: Una mirada transdisciplinar sobre el debate y sus implicaciones” (“Development, Underdevelopment, Bad Development, and Postdevelopment: A Transdisciplinary Perspective on the Debate and Its Implications”), Carta Latinoamericana: Contribuciones en desarrollo y sociedad en América Latina (Montevideo) (The Latin American Charter: Contributions on Development and Society in Latin America), 1
  26. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2014. “Trade Trends.” unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_referer=&sCS_ChosenLang=en.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Svampa, M.
Venue
South Atlantic Quarterly
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
65-82
ISSN
  • 0038-2876
  • 1527-8026
DOI
10.1215/00382876-2831290
Cited by
353
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/00382876-2831290
The paper
Svampa, M. (2015). Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America. South Atlantic Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831290