Cited by 972Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlCultural and political discourse analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monster, Terrorist, Fag: The War on Terrorism and the Production of Docile Patriots

Puar, Jasbir K., Rai, Amit S.·2002·Social Text

Abstract

Social Text - 72 (Volume 20, Number 3), Fall 2002

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/01642472-20-3_72-117

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Puar, J. K., & Rai, A. S.
Venue
Social Text
Published
2002
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
117-148
ISSN
  • 0164-2472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1951
OpenAlex
W2048070235
Cited by
972
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 27
FWCI
48.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Text (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
Keywords
war on terror, patriotism, terrorism, monsters, gender, masculinity, national security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review