The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predatory Value
Abstract
This essay introduces and theorizes the central concerns of this special issue, “Economies of Dispossession: Indigeneity, Race, Capitalism.” Financialization, debt, and the accelerated concentration of wealth today work through social relations already configured and disposed by imperial conquest and racial capitalism. In the Americas broadly and the United States specifically, colonization and transatlantic slavery set in motion the dynamics and differential racialized valuations that continue to underwrite particular forms of subjection, property, commerce, and territoriality. The conception of economies of dispossession introduced in this essay draws attention to the overriding importance of rationalities of abstraction and commensurability for racial capitalism. The essay problematizes the ways in which dispossession is conventionally treated as a self-evident and circumscribed practice of unjust taking and subtractive action. Instead, working across the lethal confluences of imperial conquest and racial capitalist predation, this essay critically situates the logic of propriation that organizes and underwrites predatory value in the historical present. Against the commensurabilities and rationalities of debt and finance capitalism, conditioned through the proprietary logics of settler colonialism and racial capitalism, the essay gestures toward alternative frameworks for building collective capacities for what the authors describe as a grounded relationality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harvey, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · Cited by 7,037
Butler, J. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203499627 · Cited by 5,556
Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition
Robinson, C. J. (1985) · Labour / Le Travail · doi:10.2307/25142575 · Cited by 4,979
Coulthard, G. S., & Alfred, T. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9781452942421 · Cited by 3,963
Glissant, E. (1997) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.10257 · Cited by 3,533
Lose your mother: a journey along the Atlantic slave route
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-0418 · Cited by 2,966
The Transit of Empire: Indigenous Critiques of Colonialism
Byrd, J. A. (2011) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816676408.001.0001 · Cited by 1,891
Self-citationMoreton‐Robinson, A. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9781452944586 · Cited by 1,850
Outside in the Teaching Machine
Franco, J., & Spivak, G. C. (1996) · boundary 2 · doi:10.2307/303580 · Cited by 1,777
da Silva, D. F. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9780816654383 · Cited by 1,416
Cited by
Gig work as migrant work: The platformization of migration infrastructure
van Doorn, N., & Vijay, D. (2024) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x211065049 · Cited by 209
Perry, K. K. (2021) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.09.003 · Cited by 109
Precarious Territory: Property Law, Housing, and the Socio‐Spatial Order
Blomley, N. (2020) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12578 · Cited by 95
More than Extraction: Rethinking Data's Colonial Political Economy
Gray, C. (2023) · International Political Sociology · doi:10.1093/ips/olad007 · Cited by 48
Native Americans and Monetary Sanctions
Stewart, R., Watters, B., Horowitz, V., Larson, R. P., Sargent, B., & Uggen, C. (2022) · RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2022.8.2.07 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Byrd, J. A., Goldstein, A., Melamed, J., & Reddy, C.
- Venue
- Social Text
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2018-06-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0164-2472 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1951
- OpenAlex
- W2883866907
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 50.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predatory Value. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/01642472-4362325
- The paper
- Byrd, J. A., Goldstein, A., Melamed, J., & Reddy, C. (2018). Predatory Value. Social Text. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-4362325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.