Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ontological Terror: Blackness, Nihilism, and Emancipation

Warren, Calvin L.·2018

Abstract

This book is born out of numerous conversations, spirited debates, noetic experiments, and silent reflections.My intention is to reinvigorate and expand a philosophical field, one often neglected and ignored: black nihilism.The thinking here represents my attempt to center the ontological crisis blackness presents to an antiblack world.This is a difficult task, and many have provided intellectual and emotional support to accomplish it.I am grateful for those who have endured my negativity, unconventional thinking, and exasperation.It takes an exceptional constitution to support a nihilistic thinker, especially when the very ground upon which the support is extended is also called into question.Words are inadequate to express my deep gratitude for those willing to travel to the depths with me, the "valley of the shadow of death," and think what seems ineffable.Identifying origins is always difficult, since innumerable factors influence the emergence of thought, but Yale University has been formative in my thinking.I would like to thank Dr.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/9780822371847

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Warren, C. L.
Published
2018
Cited by
257
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review