The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Anthropology of Christianity
Open accessAbstract
This article surveys the literature that constitutes the newly emergent anthropology of Christianity. Arguing that the development of this sub-discipline was impeded until recently by anthropology's theoretical framing and empirical interests, this article explains that demographic and world-historical forces have made it such that anthropology has had to recently come to terms with Christianity as an ethnographic object. In doing so, anthropology also has had to address its problematic relationship with Christianity, either in the religion's direct effect on the formation of the discipline, or as reflected by Christianity's influence on modernity itself, which has been vital for anthropology as both a category and as a style of cognition. In addition to these meta-theoretical questions, the anthropology of Christianity has become a space in which anthropology has been able to re-examine issues of social and cultural continuity and discontinuity in light of conversion to Christianity. Specifically, the issue of social change (often thought through or against the issue of ‘modernity’) has involved specific ethnographic examinations of fields, such as the relation between linguistic ideology and language use, economic practice, changing formations of gender and race, and the modes through which the person is culturally structured, and how that category of the person stands in relation to the social. Rather than presenting an overarching theoretical narrative, however, this review notes that these issues play out in divergent ways in differently situated communities, especially where Christianity's individuating effect may be muted where is it functions as an anti- or counter-modern force; this dynamic and contingent nature of Christianity underscores that Christianity itself is a heterogeneous object, and thus promises to be an area of rich empirical research and theoretical focus that should be beneficial not only for this sub-discipline, but also for the field of anthropology as a whole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,154
Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam.
Riesebrodt, M., & Asad, T. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074333 · Cited by 2,332
Millennial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a Second Coming
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2000) · Public Culture · doi:10.1215/08992363-12-2-291 · Cited by 1,556
Occult economies and the violence of abstraction: notes from the South African postcolony
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (1999) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1999.26.2.279 · Cited by 1,529
Ecology, Meaning, and Religion
Rappàport, R. A. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 819
Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community
Greenhouse, C. J., & Ginsburg, F. D. (1991) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3317839 · Cited by 749
Robbins, J. (2007) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/508690 · Cited by 747
The next Christendom: the coming of global Christianity
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5174 · Cited by 747
Public Religions in the Modern World.
Chaves, M., & Casanova, J. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580619 · Cited by 565
Essays on individualism: Modern ideology in anthropological perspective
Vanberg, V. (1988) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(88)90022-4 · Cited by 563
Cited by
The Christianity of anthropology
Cannell, F. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00239.x · Cited by 313
Religion and Science: Beyond the Epistemological Conflict Narrative
Evans, J. H., & Evans, M. S. (2008) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134702 · Cited by 288
Anthropologies of Revolution: Forging Time, People, and Worlds
Cherstich, I., Holbraad, M., & Tassi, N. (2020) · doi:10.1525/luminos.89 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W1961785506
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 25.10
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Anthropology of Christianity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/9780822388159
- The paper
- The Anthropology of Christianity. (2006). Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.