The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods
Abstract
On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods continues the project that the influential anthropologist, philosopher, and science studies theorist Bruno Latour advanced in his book We Have Never Been Modern. There he redescribed the Enlightenment idea of universal scientific truth, arguing that there are no facts separable from their fabrication. In this concise work, Latour delves into the “belief in naive belief,” the suggestion that fetishes—objects invested with mythical powers—are fabricated and that facts are not. Mobilizing his work in the anthropology of science, he uses the notion of “factishes” to explore a way of respecting the objectivity of facts and the power of fetishes without forgetting that both are fabricated. While the fetish-worshipper knows perfectly well that fetishes are man-made, the Modern icon-breaker inevitably erects new icons. Yet Moderns sense no contradiction at the core of their work. Latour pursues his critique of critique, or the possibility of mediating between subject and object, or the fabricated and the real, through the notion of “iconoclash,” making productive comparisons between scientific practice and the worship of visual images and religious icons.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Latour replaces the universe of the Moderns by a plurivers open to negotiation of a common world, and sees the anthropologist as a diplomat who will interconnect diverse ontologies.
“Replacing the universe of the Moderns by a plurivers open to the negotiation of a common world (Latour 2010), he sees the anthropologist as a diplomat who will interconnect diverse ontologies.”
From Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns (2013) · cites this paper as Latour 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns
Berliner, D., Legrain, L., & van de Port, M. (2013) · Social Anthropology · doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12051 · Cited by 29
The illusion of control: Do we need dark infrastructures to address light pollution?
Challéat, S., Milian, J., Foglar, H., Loose, D., Barré, K., Franchomme, M., & Godet, L. (2026) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486261456981 · Cited by 2
(Un)Real matters: Toward the making of fabrication studies
Rappert, B. (2026) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385261472827
Shamanism, Cheesecake, and Other Weird Theories
Bubandt, N. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology · doi:10.1080/14442213.2026.2697712
“Bruno Latour called this the belief in belief (Latour 2010).”
From post-truth to post-reality: Ontology, epistemology, and education’s task of reality maintenance
Zagami, J. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2680893 · Cited by 1
Rio, A. D. (2026) · Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal · doi:10.5194/sand-4-15-2026
*I keep eye contact with you.* AI intimacy and the theatrical rehearsal of non-belief
Sofaer, J. (2026) · International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media · doi:10.1080/14794713.2026.2667012
Sobre el fetichismo (racial): Hegel y Marx
Zambrana, R. (2026) · Ciencia Política · doi:10.15446/cp.v20n40.115591
Without Humanity: Physiological and Disconnected Posthuman Ethics
Vangeest, J. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2637431
Metadata
- Authors
- Latour, B.
- Corresponding author
- Latour, Bruno
- ORCID
- Latour, Bruno
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2010-12-28
- OpenAlex
- W7128726094
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- Bruno Latour, fetishism, scientific objectivity, critique of critique, scientific truth, anthropology of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review