Cited by 11Posthumanist Ethics and ActivismPhilosophical and Theoretical AnalysisPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods

Latour, Bruno·2010·Duke University Press eBooks

Abstract

On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods continues the project that the influential anthropologist, philosopher, and science studies theorist Bruno Latour advanced in his book We Have Never Been Modern. There he redescribed the Enlightenment idea of universal scientific truth, arguing that there are no facts separable from their fabrication. In this concise work, Latour delves into the “belief in naive belief,” the suggestion that fetishes—objects invested with mythical powers—are fabricated and that facts are not. Mobilizing his work in the anthropology of science, he uses the notion of “factishes” to explore a way of respecting the objectivity of facts and the power of fetishes without forgetting that both are fabricated. While the fetish-worshipper knows perfectly well that fetishes are man-made, the Modern icon-breaker inevitably erects new icons. Yet Moderns sense no contradiction at the core of their work. Latour pursues his critique of critique, or the possibility of mediating between subject and object, or the fabricated and the real, through the notion of “iconoclash,” making productive comparisons between scientific practice and the worship of visual images and religious icons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/9780822393269

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Latour replaces the universe of the Moderns by a plurivers open to negotiation of a common world, and sees the anthropologist as a diplomat who will interconnect diverse ontologies.

    “Replacing the universe of the Moderns by a plurivers open to the negotiation of a common world (Latour 2010), he sees the anthropologist as a diplomat who will interconnect diverse ontologies.”

    From Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns (2013) · cites this paper as Latour 2010

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Latour, B.
Corresponding author
Latour, Bruno
Venue
Duke University Press eBooks
Published
2010-12-28
OpenAlex
W7128726094
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
Bruno Latour, fetishism, scientific objectivity, critique of critique, scientific truth, anthropology of science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review