The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The videos create a countervisuality of an insurgency-the breaching of borders-which is seen as unacceptable by the powers that be and therefore needs to be kept invisible or erased from the public realm.
“the videos create a countervisuality of an insurgency - the breaching of borders - which, in Nicholas Mirzoeff's (2011) terms, is seen as unacceptable by the powers that be and therefore needs to kept invisible or erased from the public realm.”
From Border countervisuality: smartphone videos of border crossing and migration (2023) · cites this paper as Mirzoeff (2011)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Border countervisuality: smartphone videos of border crossing and migration
Bayramoğlu, Y. (2023) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437221136013 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirzoeff, N.
- Corresponding author
- Mirzoeff, Nicholas
- ORCID
- Mirzoeff, Nicholas
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W4239411479
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
- Keywords
- right to look, visual access, visual culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
