Inside the Mental Voting Booth: An Impression-Driven Process Model of Candidate Evaluation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human memory is a network of interconnected cognitive and affective constructs.
“First, schema theory in social cognition research has long suggested that human memory is a network of interconnected cognitive and affective constructs (Anderson & Bower, 1973;Lodge & Stroh, 1993).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Lodge & Stroh, 1993
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 923 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Lodge, M., & Stroh, P.
- Venue
- Explorations in Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 225-263
- OpenAlex
- W3081970710
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 923
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 24.96
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- voting behavior, voter psychology, political psychology, electoral decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
